Author: user

from the why-we-can’t-be-good dept

For the past few years, I’ve been using Cronometer as my nutrition app. It’s pretty good for tracking food, exercise, and more. I appreciate that it has very detailed nutritional data, and even if it is not, I can upload the nutrition label just a quick photo on my phone. It’s a nice app.

So I was very surprised last month to receive an email from a company saying that they no longer have a contract with their former data provider, a company called Trustwell, and because of that, the company has to delete previously recorded data from past meals that I have entered.

We are writing to let you know that our former food data provider, Trustwell (Formerly ESHA), requires us to remove food from our database. We believe his position is inappropriate and in violation of US law. However, we are in the process of removing Trustwell food from our database.

Such deletion will occur no later than February 15, 2025, and may be required to occur earlier based on Trustwell’s actions.

It then informs me that I need to delete data from two meals I have entered, both of them from last April. The company recommends: “If this old data is important to you, we recommend finding the item in your diary, and replacing it with an alternative from the database before removing it.”

It doesn’t matter much to me anymore since I don’t really care what I used back in April, but the whole thing seems preposterous. There are no intellectual property rights in nutrition data. In light of the Supreme Court’s ruling in Feist, I don’t see how anyone can claim copyright in that data. In Feist, it is about phone numbers in the phone book, purely factual data (in this case, phone numbers) cannot be subject to copyright, even if someone collects them in a single database. The same principle applies to nutritional data – these are hard-to-get facts, not creative expressions.

It is possible, as some have suggested to me at Bluesky, that there is a contractual agreement between Cronometer and ESHA to delete any data once the contract ends. If such consent exists, it should be limited to the database itself, not the person recording the data into a private journal. Because it’s not a “database” that’s copied into people’s tracking journals, it’s just factual data about certain foods. In addition, the user is not bound by any terms contained in Cronometer’s contract with others.

However, after digging into this story, some more details emerged, including ESHA suing Cronometer in September over this. The lawsuit alleges that the agreement between the two companies was that Cronometer would only use ESHA data for “its own internal analysis” and not make the data into a product. Chronometer’s answer to the lawsuit says it’s all nonsense. Note that the company immediately helped Cronometer implement the database into publicly available software, that the two companies are in regular contact about it, that ESHA employees told Cronometer how excited they were to review the app, and how ESHA even asked Cronometer if they could release it press about integration.

Even more to say:

The ESHA co-founder then downloaded a publicly available copy of Cronometer
software and praise Cronometer for using the ESHA database in the software,
thanks Cronometer for “playing by the rules.”

Either way, it’s another unfortunate example of the world we live in where digital services mean everything you care about can be taken away from you.

The reality is that this seems to be another thing that private equity is destroying. The email states that Cronometer had a previous deal with ESHA, which is now Trustwell. It appears that the new name is the result of a merger between ESHA and FoodLogiq, which was carried out with a combination of investment from private equity firm The Riverside Company. It seems entirely possible that after the merger, Trustwell has made it more difficult/expensive for an app like Cronometer to use its nutrition data, and now either demands more cash or removes the food already logged in from the user.

Indeed, Cronometer said in a legal filing that the private equity thugs who put together Trustwell really just wanted to break their deal with Cronometer so they could build a competing app:

What actually underlies this lawsuit is not a “secret” “scheme” by Cronometer,
who use the database is always open and publicly recognized by ESHA.
However, this lawsuit is part of a scheme designed by Trustwell and its investors to create a
monopoly for one other product: Food Processor®, their diet tracking app
competing with Cronometer products. This claim is supported by private infusion
equity money that bought ESHA and formed Trustwell. That is a private equity investor
seeks to monetize investments by illegally supporting Food Processor®
market through the pursuit of baseless litigations against small companies like
Cronometer to scare them out of the market with the threat of substantial legal
expenditure.

Once again, this is why we can’t have nice things.

Filed Under: copyright, data, fair use, food tracking, nutrition tracking, private equity

Companies: chronometer, riverside company, trustwell

I’ve been looking for a projector on and off for a few years. I’m not really committed, but I’m still tempted. I don’t want anything fancy but rather a tool that will do well in a dark-enough environment, maybe something I can easily do from one place to another. The projector will never be the center of my streaming world, just an option.

With that in mind, I’m excited to see LG’s “breakthrough” PF600U device launched ahead of CES 2025. The product name alone won’t do this device justice, but it’s clear now that we’re talking about a floor lamp. which is also a projector and three are Bluetooth speakers.

LG’s light projector may have two projects aplenty, but I still think it’s an interesting concept, at least in theory.

LG said in a press release that the PF600U is a CES Innovation Award winner.

The device looks like a floor lamp, using LED lights to illuminate the room. LG also mentions mood lighting, saying that you can adjust it to the ambiance of the room and the user’s preferences. The lamp supports nine colors and five levels of brightness.

Regarding the projector’s capabilities, the LG lamp supports Full HD (1920 x 1080) projection, a brightness of 300 ANSI lumens, and OTT streaming through LG’s webOS system. The lamp head can turn 110 degrees, and the projector supports automatic screen adjustment feature.

Finally, the LG light projector can also be used as a Bluetooth stereo speaker.

Unfortunately, LG did not provide a price and release date. I will also say that I don’t have high expectations for a projector that can also be used as a lamp. But the affordable price point could be just what my home gym needs: a bigger screen to keep track of training sessions.

The lamp will project an image that is 30 by 120 inches in size.

LG also announced a more advanced projector in the same press release. The CineBeam S is a compact 4K UST short-throw projector that might be better suited for Netflix streaming duties.

The device supports 4K resolution, 500 ANSI lumens brightness, and coverage of 154 percent of the DCI-P3 color spectrum. More importantly, the CineBeam S only needs a few inches of space to project images that can be anywhere between 40 inches and 100 inches large.

CineBeam S measures only 160 x 160 x 110mm and weighs 2.5kg (5.51 pounds).

Like LG’s light projectors, the CineBeam S doesn’t have a price or a release date yet.

from the good-deal-on-cool-items dept

Start your language learning journey with a lifetime subscription to Rosetta Stone for all languages. Trusted by top organizations like NASA, Calvin Klein, and TripAdvisor, Rosetta Stone has been the go-to language learning software for the past 27 years. With immersive and intuitive training methods, you can be reading, writing, and speaking a new language with confidence in no time. On sale for $180.

Note: Techdirt Deals Store is powered and curated by StackCommerce. A portion of all sales from Techdirt Deals help support Techdirt. Products displayed do not reflect endorsement by our editorial team.

Filed Under: daily deals

from the not-actually-wanting-to-defuse-the-entire-ACAB-thing dept

What will surprise no one, the Arizona prosecutor decided that no police should be punished for cooperating with a different Arizona prosecutor to portray the violent anti-police protesters as gang members with the sole purpose of getting a sentence enhancement.

Like millions across the country, residents of Phoenix, Arizona took to the streets to protest police brutality and advocate for increased police accountability. Obviously, some of the police were sympathetic to the protest.

But Phoenix police officers (he is the subject of a recent DOJ investigation) decided it was not enough to throw some people behind bars in “insulting the police” charges that often accompany anti-police protests. They went one step further, colluding with the Maricopa County attorney’s office to treat legitimate protests as acts of gang violence. The evidence that the police and the prosecutor offered to the court was ludicrous. He insisted on using the word “ACAB” (All Police Bastards) as nothing more than a few gang tags. Using this and similar statements of doubt, Phoenix PD and prosecutors hope to end at least some people in prison with sentence enhancements – The sort of thing that turns misdemeanors into serious felonies and can add up to a decade to the sentence prison

This included lying to the jury members about the definition of ACAB for the sole purpose of producing (false) gang charges to disperse the arrested protesters.

Q: And do you find that the ACAB follows the same philosophy, like the Bloods and the Crips?

A: Yes.

Q: And could it even be the same philosophy as the Hell’s Angels?

A: Very similar, yes.

Q: And why the same?

A: I think because of the tattoos, the intimidation factor, how they direct violent behavior that is very similar to the Hells Angel organization where they actually organize violent behavior, and then do it in an organized way. It’s not random with the Hells Angels.

Q: And you find what this ACAB group is doing is organizing to create violence?

A: Yes.

This would be funny if it wasn’t actually scary. Cops lied to jurors, with the blessing of Maricopa County prosecutors, in hopes of taking away years of people’s freedom.

An investigation by a local news station (ABC15) revealed all of this, exposing the police and prosecutors involved in this allegation, including April Sponsel, who is married to a state trooper. More investigations should follow, but Arizona law enforcement agencies have universally refused to dig into this misconduct by Phoenix PD and Maricopa County officials. At only investigations conducted by the government are handled by people who no longer work any branch of government, as ABC15 reports.

A criminal investigation was launched against retired FBI agent James Egelston as several other Arizona law enforcement agencies refused to investigate the scandal. The investigation of Egelston was submitted to the Pinal County Prosecutor’s Office due to Maricopa County’s role in defrauding the protesters.

The end result is nothing. Everyone involved will face zero consequences for their actions because of Pinal County prosecutors parallel not interested in holding the police and prosecutors accountable.

[I]declination letter, Pinal County Attorney Kent Volkmer wrote the incident review board office which will not bring the case.

“It is the Board’s opinion that none of the (individuals) committed acts that warrant criminal prosecution,” according to the letter.

Tampering, perjury, filing false reports…nothing deserves even the slightest punishment. And even with the US DOJ coming to the same conclusion about false accusations and perjury. Maricopa County has tacitly agreed to be targeted by this nonsense and offered a $6 million settlement to the arrested protesters. The city of Phoenix, however, still thinks it’s a wise use of public funds to continue fighting the protesters’ lawsuits, signaling to crooked police that it will do whatever it takes to stop them. acknowledge guilt, let alone be punished.

Since no one in power wants to make it more difficult for officers and prosecutors to forget (recent) historical mistakes, the citizens of the city and district will surely repeat the performance of the alleged civil servant.

Filed under: 1st amendment, acab, arizona, black lives matter, gang database, pd phoenix, police brutality, police violence

Apple is expected to release AirPods Pro 3 in 2025. Three years after the first iteration of AirPods Pro 2 with Lightning port was launched, Cupertino is expected to add the best earbuds. Despite the fact that last year’s AirPods Max update was disappointing, we expect Apple’s next-generation AirPods Pro to be a bigger update thanks to some new features and upgrades.

This article covers eight rumored features that should make the AirPods Pro 3 an instant hit, and potentially the best earbuds on the planet.

Better ANC: Apple has offered an amazing ANC. With advanced algorithms, the company also offers best-in-class Transparency and Adaptive modes. For the third-generation AirPods Pro, Apple is expected to greatly improve ANC, and may build on the technology available for AirPods 4, which offers ANC even without ear tips.

Better hearing aid capabilities: AirPods Pro 2 are the first earbuds to offer hearing aid capabilities. It is certain that Apple will continue to improve this feature with the upcoming version of the earbuds pro. In addition, there is another reason why the capabilities of hearing aids will improve with the next generation.

H3 chip: Apple does a great job with audio chips. All the way from the W1 chip and magical features, the company has walked a long way to bring the H2 processor. Until now, Apple continues to add more features to the AirPods Pro 2. It is certain that Cupertino will continue to improve the audio quality and connectivity between the AirPods and the iPhone while delivering new features, such as better ANC, better hearing aid capabilities, and more -apart.

Heart rate measurement: according to BloombergMark Gurman, one of the top features of the AirPods Pro 3 is probably the heart rate measurement. At the time, the reporter said that the measurements of the Apple Watch were more accurate than the AirPods prototype, but not by much. This can be perfect for those who don’t like wearing smartwatches all the time.

Body temperature: Finally, Apple has also been working on a body temperature sensor for the upcoming AirPods. The company could add a camera to help measure body temperature, which could be more accurate than the sensors that come with the Apple Watch.

Other tidbits for the upcoming AirPods Pro 3 may include better battery life, a thinner case (if we consider the AirPods 4), stronger water and dust resistance, and more.

Wrap it up

These are the features you can most expect in the upcoming AirPods Pro 3. BGR will let you know as we learn more about this device.

Making sure you have the right Wi-Fi network at home can make all the difference whether you’re streaming content to your TV or playing games, and Wi-Fi 7 technology is the latest technology the networking world has to offer. It’s fast and stable, and now you can upgrade your home to Wi-Fi 7 all while saving $80.

This TP-Link BE9300 router normally retails for almost $300, but a limited-time deal means you can only pay $219.99. This is a deal that won’t last long, but you don’t need to do anything special to take advantage of it. That means no on-screen coupons or discount codes are needed here, but you need to make sure to act quickly; otherwise, you risk missing out.

This router supports six-stream Wi-Fi 7 with a maximum throughput of 9.2Gbps. There are also six antennas to ensure home coverage of up to 2,000 square feet, and the router is also designed to work with mesh systems if that’s the route you want to go.

High-speed connection users will enjoy 2.5 gigabit WAN ports, while there are also four LAN ports of the same speed as well. That means this router is ready for future devices that offer fast wired connections as well as the latest in wireless connectivity, all at a price that saves $80 for a limited time only.

Buy: TP-Link BE9300: $219.99 | Original price: $300

You might also like to check out:

You can follow us on X, or Instagram, subscribe to our YouTube channel and even like our Facebook page so you can stay updated with all the latest from Microsoft, Google, Apple, and the Web.

The iPhone 16 has excellent battery life, which I can say as a former iPhone 16 Plus owner. Battery life is the least of my worries, and I only need to charge my iPhone every day. Not only the Plus and Pro Max have better battery life, but all variants of the iPhone 16.

As we approach the launch of Apple’s iPhone 17 series, I expect Apple to continue to improve battery life in at least three of the four models. The rumored iPhone 17 Air will compromise battery performance so Apple can make the phone thinner.

Hopefully the iPhone 17 generation delivers on the big battery breakthrough rumors teased in previous years. Apple is supposed to be developing a new battery technology that can significantly increase the battery life of the iPhone. Rumors have mentioned solid-state batteries in the past, as well as new materials for anodes and cathodes. Next-generation batteries will have higher density in addition to higher capacity, and may support faster charging rates.

However, this big battery upgrade may not be ready in 2025. However, we will have to wait until the iPhone 18 series comes out, which will be the right time because it may include a foldable iPhone model.

The next generation of battery technology is underway

The Korean leak is well known by name eyes1122 write a blog post about the battery innovations that will come to smartphones in the coming years. Apparently, the Chinese vendor wants to equip the 2026 smartphone with a battery ranging from 7,000 mAh to 8,000 mAh, but they do not want to make the device thicker.

The leak says that Apple and Samsung are also developing battery technology innovations to respond to this type of competition.

Chinese batteries will use high-grade silicon materials instead of relying on previous lithium-ion technology. Samsung is supposed to be working on new battery materials for the cathode and anode, looking to develop a new type of battery.

The leaker said that Samsung has made significant progress with the technology. Companies can add more silicon to batteries while avoiding side effects like battery expansion.

eyes1122 also said that Apple has a very similar strategy, with the first iPhone battery breakthrough coming in 2026. This means that the iPhone 18 model could offer significant battery life improvements.

Chinese phones already use silicon-carbon batteries

Nothing is confirmed at the moment, but I will remind you that Chinese vendors like Honor have been using silicon-carbon batteries for several years. Initially, the battery technology was limited to units sold in China. Honor then brought the technology to Europe last year with the Honor Magic 6 Pro 5,600 mAh battery.

Interestingly, Honor announced the Magic 7 Lite phone this week, a mid-range device with a 6,600 mAh silicon-carbon battery and 66W charging support. Honor seems ready to use new battery technology in cheaper phones while increasing capacity. This confirms, at least in part, that Chinese vendors are pushing new smartphone battery technology to other phones.

What exactly is Apple doing?

Look at it eyes1122 report, a different leak connects the story to rumors from late 2023. Jukanlosreve pointed at ETNews a story I know. Back in 2023, I said that the iPhone would get the special Apple battery technology described in the Korean report.

It’s unclear when Apple will have the technology ready, and it still isn’t. But the ETNews The report says that Apple is creating a “completely new battery” by developing new materials for the cathode and anode. Apple wants to replace graphite with silicon in the anode while ensuring the new material won’t expand during charging and discharging.

The silicon-carbon batteries used by Chinese vendors also have anodes that replace graphite with silicon.

What I do know is that Apple is likely to deliver a major breakthrough in iPhone battery life, although it may not be ready this year.

In addition to competing with Chinese phones with monster batteries, the technology could also improve the battery life of the iPhone 18 Air and iPhone 18 Fold, which could be launched next year. But this is just the speculation and wishful thinking of this long-time iPhone user.

The upcoming iPhone 17 Air looks like the real product after every leak. This time, South Korea Remaining Journal (by MacRumors) announced the price of the iPhone 17 Air and the exact thickness.

According to the publication, Apple is aiming for this device to be 6.25mm, which will make this device the thinnest iPhone ever. MacRumors points out that this will make the iPhone 17 Air 20% thinner than the regular iPhone 16 model and 25% thinner than the iPhone 16 Pro version.

This leak is confirmed by another source who previously stated that Apple is planning to release the iPhone 17 Air with a thickness of around 5mm to 6mm. Now, after rumors that Cupertino wants to charge extra for this device, Sisa Journal believes that this iPhone will be a replacement for the Plus model, and Apple will likely maintain the iPhone Plus price point for this Air version.

That means the price of the iPhone 17 Air could be $899 — or at least a variation of the price of the iPhone 16 Plus, depending on the configuration Apple offers.

However, it is safer to assume that the iPhone 17 Air will be cheaper than the Pro model, but that does not mean that Apple will not offer a price increase in the range. Last December, a leak connected jukanlosreve shows the following quote from Jong Wook Lee, senior researcher at Samsung Securities Research Center:

Although there were initial expectations that the price of Apple’s iPhone would rise this year, the price did not rise. As a result, profits have been declining since the third quarter of this year. iPhone prices are expected to increase next year.

The leak speculates that the Galaxy S25, S26, iPhone 17, and iPhone 18 may be subject to price increases. Obviously, if the Galaxy S25 and iPhone 17 see a price increase, their successors will also be more expensive than the Galaxy S24 and iPhone 16 2024. Samsung and Apple should not raise prices two years in a row. And I’m not sure customers would appreciate that scenario.

Below, you can learn more about the iPhone 17 Air.

iOS 18.2 has been available for a few weeks now. However, some iPhone users – myself included – have noticed a bug that prevents the camera from working since this new version update. A Reddit thread was posted two weeks ago, and users are still complaining about the issue without a fix.

The first user to post a thread on Reddit wrote:

Since I updated to ios 18.2 my camera refuses to work, for example when I try to use the camera app it’s just a black screen, I have to open it again 2-3 sometimes to get it to work, same for snapchat camera. it will just go black and have to restart the app once or twice to get it to work. My flash also refuses to work or is too late to activate through the action button or control center sometimes, more often through the action button does not work.

One of the top comments in this thread mentioned the same problem: “Same problem with me. I thought it was the phone at first, but looking on the forum, apparently it happened with 18.2. I just got the phone last weekend, so I thought it was just the phone and going back and replacing it but it seems to be a SW problem.I get the same black screen if I use the camera control button, the camera icon, or from the lock screen.

I myself have dealt with this iOS 18.2 camera bug, specifically when opening the iPhone 16 Pro camera with Camera Control before being recognized by Face ID. By pressing Camera Control with the display locked, the camera app usually opens to a black screen, and even Face ID stops working.

Fortunately, reports claim that Apple is working on an iOS 18.2.1 update. Although it is not clear whether this version can fix this particular iOS 18.2 bug, some iPhone users have found that replacing their device with Apple does not even fix the bug.

Another option is to download iOS 18.3 beta 1. A new build is expected soon, as Apple is reportedly planning a release for later this month.

from the kill-freedom-‘for-the-children’ dept

Like too many legislators, Arkansas politicians have decided it’s time to codify irrational hatred. To do this, they pretend they have a sudden and urgent new the obligation to protect “children” harder than they have ever been protected before from the encroachment of an alternative point of view.

Like so many other states, the Arkansas government supports obscenity laws that exist to declare content that one does not personally like as “obscene”. Then he went further, harassing librarians in public libraries with civil and criminal penalties for not practicing adequate censorship.

And, like many similar hate efforts, this codification of hate died in federal court. Public library plaintiffs were able to secure a temporary injunction blocking Arkansas’ book ban from taking effect last summer. The catch is: the law will be blocked only until the government presents a revised case for expanded censorship. If it can be demonstrated that there is a legitimate government interest in banning books that these legislators feel are harmful to children, the law can be reinstated.

However, if incompetent demonstrate this, librarians and library associations will be free to continue to open their libraries without government intervention – what they have been doing for years before Donald Trump took office in 2016 and entered the worst era called “conservatism.” Since then, book challenges and book bans have become a daily occurrence in the Land of the Free. And all in the hands of the party that vowed here to defeat censorship again.

This isn’t the only lawsuit the Arkansas government is facing. Others, filed by parents who objected to the First Amendment right of access being undermined by the government forcibly moving some content to the “adult only” area of ​​the library (and, of course, this content almost always targets LGBTQ + authors and / or critical content. History of racism long America) is still being done.

But this has come to an expected end, as reported by the Associated Press:

A federal judge on Monday struck down an important part of the Arkansas law that would allow criminal charges against librarians and booksellers for providing “dangerous” material to minors.

U.S. District Judge Timothy Brooks found that elements of the law were unconstitutional.

As always, the Associated Press seems to be able to access the court’s decision, but refused show rule with the reader.

Here is my full opinion [PDF]it belongs to me: someone who not only contributes to RECAP, but also knows how to search.

All of the laws — one starting with a signature allegedly written in crayon by Governor (and former Donald Trump PR flack) Sarah Huckabee Sanders — have yet to be blocked. A small part of it is life. But the mandate that was criticized in court gives the original order is no longer on the table.

Here’s what the court said about the law in its first ruling:

The job of a librarian requires a commitment to freedom of speech and the celebration of different viewpoints unlike any other profession. Librarians manage collections of reading materials for the entire community, and in doing so, they reinforce the fundamental principles upon which this country was founded. According to the United States Supreme Court, “Public libraries pursue the worthy mission of facilitating learning and cultural enrichment.”

[…]

The librarian’s enemy is the censor who judges dissenting opinions as harmful, immoral, or wrong.

Public libraries in the 21st century are funded and overseen by state and local governments, with the help of taxpayer dollars. However, public libraries cannot be mistaken for simply being an arm of the state. By virtue of its mission to provide citizens with access to a wide array of information, viewpoints, and content, the public library is certainly not a creation of the state; it’s a person.

And this is what they are saying now, because it says that libraries and librarians are not legitimate.

[B]y prescribe mandatory procedures for evaluating challenges, Section 5 actually prevents libraries from relying on their already widely used policies for responsiveness to patron feedback., including negative feedback, without allowing too many challenges or allowing the opinion of a vocal few to dictate what is generally available to the public.

And this imposition – especially when connected to civil and criminal penalties – cannot be considered constitutional, not with the amount of damage done to the First Amendment. The government cannot argue that this kind of censorship is something that free speech jurisprudence cannot reach by pretending that it is not within its protections. (Emphasis in original.)

The State’s Section 5 defense raises the argument that constitutionally protected censorship of speech is acceptable because of every choice decision that affects the public library’s collection – from the purchase of original materials by librarians, to the placement of books on special shelves or in the back. locked door, to remove outright from the collection-ie “government speech” is not subject to constitutional oversight.

But Section 5 has nothing to do with library curation decisions, so if that decision is government speech, the State’s argument in this regard is without merit. First, no one disputes that librarians are violating patrons’ First Amendment rights through curation decisions. Second, it restricts access to books in public library collections or removes books from the collection because of content or point of view-which Section 5 permits, if not encourages here-infringes the First Amendment and does not qualify as protected government speech.

Summing it all up, the court said that two clauses of the book ban law were invalid under the US Constitution.

Here, it is clear that there are no conditions that can be applied in sections 1 and 5. The State has not tried to adjust Section 1 based on the interpretation of the Arkansas Supreme Court of “danger to minors,” although the State has been on notice of the broad sweep of this definition since 2004. In addition, section 5 contains some undefined terms that invite censorship decisions based on content.

A permanent injunction is in place. The state can continue to enforce what is left of the law, but what is left will not allow these fanatical legislators to achieve their goal of removing content libraries they do not like. I imagine they will try to rewrite the law. But if they can’t get it right the first time, they probably won’t find a legally credible basis for mass censorship a second time. Unfortunately, this nation is loaded with bigots, including a sizable voting bloc that continues to elect bigots with the sole purpose of imposing their point of view on every other Arkansas resident unfortunate enough to share the state.

What has been struck down here will be resurrected. However, at this point, there is still no way the government can do it. But with Donald Trump back in office with a boatload of embarrassing lackeys in tow, who knows what the Constitution will look like half a decade from now.

Filed Under: 1st amendment, arkansas, book ban, bookseller, censorship, for children, free speech, library, obscenity, sarah huckabee sanders