Local

Texas doctor who says he performed abortion sued in first known challenges under new law

A San Antonio lawyer who wrote a Washington Post dissenting claim that he violated Texas’ six-week abortion ban is currently facing at least two proceedings filed against him under the ban. A lawsuit was filed Monday by former tax attorney Oscar Stilly in Texas, who sentenced him to home confinement on a federal conviction for tax offenses. He filed a proceeding in Bexar County against doctor Dr. Alan Blade. Stilly said in a telephone interview with CNN that he is an opponent of most abortion-ban laws in the state, but wants to clarify how judges decide on the constitution. “I am a supporter of the Constitution and I am against the law,” he said. Felipe N. Gomez, who lives in Illinois, has also filed a second proceeding against Braid, calling himself a “pro-choice plaintiff.” The six-week abortion ban, which came into force on September 1, was specially designed by ban supporters to circumvent judicial review, and abortion advocates have so far forced federal courts to block the law. I couldn’t. .. The Texas State Parliament does not force government authorities to ban through criminal or regulatory penalties, but rather private civil in state court against abortion providers or others who promote abortion in violation of the law. In essence, it represented a private citizen with the ability to file a lawsuit. “SB8 says’anyone’can sue for abortion, and it’s starting to happen, including by out-of-state claimants,” said Mark, senior adviser to Braid’s Reproductive Rights Center.・ Harlon said. Braid did not immediately respond to CNN’s inquiries in a federal proceeding against the ban on abortion. Anti-abortion activists who defended the new ban, like many abortion providers in the state, advertised the immediate effects of abortion. “The question is not whether Dr. Blade will win the proceeding, but it will almost certainly win,” he said. “This is a way to prevent future SB8 proceedings,” added Steve Vladeck, CNN legal analyst and professor at the University of Texas at Austin School. “And what happens in this case cannot prevent future proceedings from being filed. It is the whole of transferring enforcement power from a single state to an infinite class of potential private plaintiffs. That’s the point. ”Stilley’s proceedings were first reported by The Washington Post. Stilley. He told CNN that he was suing Blade because he wanted a “judge to rule” the law. Stilly, who was charged with several federal tax offenses in 2009 and later convicted, said he was his lawyer in the proceedings.

A doctor in San Antonio, who wrote the Washington Post editorial, claimed to have violated Texas’ six-week abortion ban and is currently facing at least two proceedings filed against him under the ban. increase.

Oscar Stilly, a former tax lawyer in Arkansas who is under house arrest on a federal conviction for tax evasion, filed a proceeding on Monday.

He filed a proceeding in Bexar County against doctor Dr. Alan Blade.

In a telephone interview with CNN, Stilly said he was an opponent of most abortion-ban laws in the state, but wanted to clarify how judges could determine constitutionality.

“I’m a supporter of the Constitution and I’m against the law,” Stilly said.

Felipe N. Gomez, who lives in Illinois, has filed a second proceeding against Braid, calling himself a “pro-choice plaintiff” in the proceedings.

The proceedings open a new front in the court war over a six-week abortion ban that came into force on September 1.

Abortion advocates have so far failed to force federal courts to block the law. This is because supporters of the ban specifically designed the law to avoid judicial review. The Texas State Parliament does not force government authorities to ban through criminal or regulatory penalties, but rather private civil in state court against abortion providers or others who promote abortion in violation of the law. In essence, it represented a private citizen with the ability to file a lawsuit.

“SB8 says’anyone’can sue for abortion, and that’s starting to happen, including by plaintiffs outside the state,” said Mark, senior adviser to Braid’s Reproductive Rights Center. Harlon said. He said in a statement Monday in a federal proceeding against the ban on abortion.

Braid didn’t immediately answer CNN’s inquiry.

Anti-abortion activists who defended the new ban advertised the chilling effect it had immediately, as many abortion providers in the state have publicly stated that they are currently in compliance with the law.

“The question is not whether Dr. Blade will win the proceedings. He will almost certainly win,” said Steve Vladeck, CNN Legal Analyst and Professor of Law at the University of Texas.

“This is a way to prevent future SB8 proceedings,” Uradek added. “And what happens in this case cannot prevent future proceedings from being filed. It is the whole of transferring enforcement power from a single state to an infinite class of potential private plaintiffs. Point. “

Stilly’s proceedings were first reported by The Washington Post.

Stilly told CNN that he was suing Blade for seeking a “judge to make a decision” on the law.
“I think the doctor has the guts and he has the principles. I decided I would be alone to clarify this law,” Stilly said.

Stilly, who was charged with several federal tax offenses in 2009 and later convicted, said he was his own lawyer in the case.

Texas doctor who says he performed abortion sued in first known challenges under new law Source link Texas doctor who says he performed abortion sued in first known challenges under new law

Related Articles

Back to top button