Student sues San Diego Unified, objects to vaccine mandate for religious reasons

A student at Scripps Ranch High School sued the San Diego Unified School District in federal court, arguing that the new student vaccine obligation constitutes religious discrimination.

A 16-year-old junior student at Scripps Ranch High School said her religious beliefs prohibited her from being vaccinated.

The complaint claims that vaccination is contrary to the beliefs of student Christians, as the COVID-19 vaccine was tested on stem cell lines derived from an aborted foetation. The proceedings state that the district violates her First Amendment’s right to freely exercise her faith.

Identified as Jill Doe in the complaint, she is represented by the Thomas More Society, a non-profit law firm dealing with the issue of religious freedom.

“Jill Doe’s belief prevents her from receiving the currently available COVID-19 vaccine because of contamination by aborted fetal cells,” the complaint said.

September 28, San Diego Unified Board of Education Unanimously approve policy Staff and students over the age of 16 must be fully vaccinated with COVID-19 by December 20 in order to continue attending school directly. This means that students will need to take their first dose by November 29th.

According to the district’s plan, unvaccinated people should be distanced. The district said existing state laws governing immunity do not allow exemptions from students’ personal beliefs.

Paul Jona, a lawyer working on the Rancho Santa Fe-based case, said he hopes to receive an urgent injunction against the rules by the student’s first dose deadline on November 29.

If the proceedings win, students can stay in class and urge the district to revise its policy on religious exemptions from COVID-19 vaccination, he said.

If a student had to return to distance learning, she would miss direct instruction and athletic activities, and her family would have to look for other educational options for her, he said.

Under San Diego Unified policy, teachers and other staff may request an exemption from religious or personal beliefs, but students who do not want to be vaccinated should be exempted only for medical reasons. Can be done, the lawsuit said.

However, certain groups of students, including students participating in youth development, homelessness, immigrants, military families, or tutoring programs, do not need to be vaccinated on the same timeline.

The proceedings argue that if those students are eligible for a vaccine exemption or postponement, the district must extend it to students who oppose it for religious reasons.

“If granting a medical tax exemption is okay and does not pose a threat to students, the city or school district must grant a religious tax exemption,” Jona said.

Students and other vaccine opponents say they oppose the drug because of its ties to fetal stem cell lines decades ago.

The vaccine does not contain fetal stem cells. However, stem cells cultured from the first samples of selective abortion in the 1960s and 1970s were used in early “proof-of-concept” studies of the Pfizer and Moderna mRNA vaccine research process.

The cells used today have been cultured and replicated from the original lineage, but have been removed for generations from the samples obtained after selective miscarriage.

many Other medicines It uses the same ubiquitous stem cell line for product testing purposes and contains common drugs such as albuterol, aspirin, ibuprofen, Tylenol, peptobismol, and tam.

Jona said many of these drugs believed were developed before the stem cell line was used, but the product was subsequently tested on fetal stem cells. He said the student and her family draw an ethical distinction between those processes.

“Our clients are opposed to using real fetal cells in the development of vaccines or testing them with fetal cell lines,” he said.

The Vatican and the Ethics and Religious Freedom Commission of the Southern Baptist Convention of the United States have issued a statement advising the congregation that the use of vaccines does not constitute cooperation with the abortion from which their stem cells were originally derived.

Jonah did not identify which church the student belonged to, but said the church shared her position on the COVID-19 vaccine.

The proceedings also allege that students do not need to be vaccinated because the COVID-19 antibody test showed that she had previously been exposed to the virus and acquired some degree of innate immunity.

Earlier this month, Governor Gavin Christopher announced a state-wide mission that would affect students in public and private schools. His order makes the COVID-19 vaccine mandatory for semester students with full federal approval of the vaccine for each age group starting at age 12 and above.

Its mission is to add the COVID-19 vaccine to the list of other vaccines needed to attend school, such as measles, mumps, and rubella vaccines.

There is no personal belief exemption for those shots. However, because Newsome’s mission was an order, not a law, he said he allowed students to be exempt from “personal beliefs” about COVID-19 shots.

Richard Barrera, Unification President of San Diego, and other district managers were not asked for comment on Monday. Barrera recently said the district has not provided COVID-19 Shot students with an exemption from personal beliefs, as families could exploit the loophole to reduce vaccination coverage.

Jona said that if his client wins, San Diego Unified may be required to revise the list of vaccination exemptions.

“If the court decides in our favor and finds it unconstitutional, I say the San Diego Unified School District needs to change its policy and provide tax exemption for everyone’s personal beliefs. I believe, “he said.

This is not the only legal challenge to vaccine obligations in San Diego. Earlier this month, Let Them Choose, a project of the anti-mask group Let Them Breathe, filed a proceeding against San Diego Unified in the San Diego High Court. If they are not vaccinated.

Student sues San Diego Unified, objects to vaccine mandate for religious reasons Source link Student sues San Diego Unified, objects to vaccine mandate for religious reasons

Related Articles

Back to top button