Repeat ballot measure to lift 30-foot height limit in the Midway District moves forward

The proposal to lift the 30-foot-high ceiling in San Diego’s Midway area remains well on its way to appearing to the city’s voters this fall.

On Wednesday, the Rules of Procedure of the Municipal Council voted unanimously in favor of promoting the ballot in the plenary session of the council for final consideration. The action completes the measure that will be placed by the council at the November polls – two years after the electorate approved the E-measure and OK’d tallest buildings in the 1,324-acre area that includes the San Diego sports arena. A court decision later overturned the decree.

“This is very important,” said Council member Chris Kate, who proposed the measure on the ballot. “(The measure) obviously, we know from the past, has a broad base of support from all over the city to really realize a vision for this area and (I look forward to the day we can move beyond that.”

North of San Diego International Airport and south of Mission Bay, Midway County is subject to a 1972 referendum on buildings over 30 feet in the coastal zone, or what is now protected ground extending from the water to the Interstate 5 at the border. city’s.

The 2022 ballot proposal seeks to remove the Midway area from the coastal zone, with supporters reiterating that the area was moved arbitrarily to the San Diego coastal zone and that coastal views that the name is intended to protect are absent.

“Without public corridors, an exception to the height limit would be the catalyst to revitalize the community design vision by attracting the necessary investment in the Midway Pacific-Highway design area,” Cate’s staff member Anthony George told the committee.

The last sentence is one an exact copy of the previous initiative. Measure E, approved by 57 per cent of voters in November 2020, succeeded in changing the city’s municipal code to exclude the area from the coastal zone. But a San Diego Supreme Court judge ruled in December that the decree was illegal. The city, the court said, should have studied the environmental impact of the tallest buildings before putting the measure in front of voters.

San Diego designers have been doing it ever since published a draft environmental impact analysis and we expect to complete the report in time for the council to consider repeating the initiative. Separately, the city prosecutor’s office is appealing against the Supreme Court ruling.

The Municipal Council must vote on the placement of the measure on the ballot by August 12.

At stake is San Diego’s multi-year effort to rebuild its real estate at no. 3220, 3240, 3250 and 3500 Sports Arena Blvd. The city real estate department is currently considering three development teams to rent and dramatically renovate the 48-acre property with thousands of apartments, ground-floor retail stores, public amenities and a new arena. All offers require a combination of homes, offices, hotels and sports facilities that exceed the 30-foot height limit, making them impossible without a change in the municipal code.

The city has said it hopes to select a bidder winner before the end of the year, although it is unclear whether the selection will be made before or after the election. The timing is important as the success of the ballot box will depend on a successful campaign and it is unlikely that all three groups will pay to fund an initiative that benefits only one of them.

window.fbAsyncInit = function() {
FB.init({ appId: ‘125832154430708’, xfbml: true,
version: ‘v12.0’
if (document.getElementById(‘facebook-jssdk’) === null) {
const js = document.createElement(‘script’);
js.id = ‘facebook-jssdk’;
js.async = true;
js.setAttribute(‘crossorigin’, ‘anonymous’)
window.setTimeout(function () {
}, 1500);

Repeat ballot measure to lift 30-foot height limit in the Midway District moves forward Source link Repeat ballot measure to lift 30-foot height limit in the Midway District moves forward

Related Articles

Back to top button