Parents sue LAUSD, push for wider reopening, no COVID tests

A group of parents who say their children have been illegally short-changed by the Los Angeles Unified School District’s reinstatement plan are seeking a court order to force the school district to reopen “as much as possible” within seven days.

A proceeding filed late Wednesday requires the court to ban LA Unified from using the 6-foot distance standard in the classroom. It also seeks to ban school districts from requiring students to undergo regular coronavirus testing as a condition for returning to campus.

Starting next week, the school district’s reopening plan offers an on-campus half-time schedule for elementary school students and on-campus supervised online instruction for junior high and high school students. This form characterizes the proceedings as harmful and legally inadequate.

“There is no reason why plaintiffs’ children need to suffer from limited class hours or short lesson days a few days a week in a distance learning model on campus, all over California and even in Los Angeles. Los Angeles County — Enjoy the full schedule of face-to-face learning five days a week, “complains. “LAUSD schoolchildren and their families suffer irreparable damage every day as schools remain closed for direct instruction.”

Plaintiffs are four parents, and as a result of the campus closure for over a year during a pandemic, how children of different ages are academically and socially liberated, poorly graded, and traumatized. I explained if I was suffering from.

The complaint contains the story of one parent, identified by the initial DR. The parent’s little son used to be happy and perform well. However, when the campus was closed, the boy “sees only through the zoom and struggles to connect with other students who are angry, angry, rude, and have no incentive to do anything other than play video games. He gained weight, became lonely, and expressed suicidal ideation to his parents. “

Under health guidelines, LA Unified may have been opened for elementary school students February 16 — If you apply for a county exemption, the early grades will be earlier.Middle school and high school students may have returned to school As early as March 15th..

Parents who participated together by name California Student UnitedSaid on their website that they can no longer wait to return to the normal schedule of the second largest school system in the United States and can no longer rely on school officials.

“LAUSD Board and Support. Boytner has no valid legal or health and safety basis to justify the reopening plan,” the group said in a Thursday release.

Parent group brought the same lawyer Proceeded successfully in San Diego CountyPrevents the state from enforcing guidelines that require a distance of 4 feet between desks. 3 feet apart Current recommended standards Set by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Following that ruling, state officials withdrew all distant requirements. The regulation has since been updated again, said Roger Butler, a spokesman for the California Department of Health and Welfare.

“Currently, in state guidance, At least 3 feet for students In the classroom, it is in line with the latest guidance recently issued by the Federal CDC, “Butler said Wednesday.

Health officials in Los Angeles County, which previously required a 6-foot separation, are in line with state and federal guidance. However, as with the state, it also allows local district leaders to make their own decisions about whether to exceed 3 feet.

The difference between 3 feet and 6 feet is very important. The 3-foot distance basically allows for a typical full-class return in a typical California classroom. In contrast, at 6-foot intervals, logistically, students are required to attend classes part-time directly with a time lag. The staggered attendance format is called a hybrid plan because it includes both face-to-face instruction and distance learning during class hours from home.

The proceedings are trying to discontinue the coronavirus testing required for students because the health authorities do not require testing. The proceedings argue that students should not be barred from having a higher quality schooling experience on campus simply because their families are willing to submit tests that are not required by health authorities. There is.

The teachers union — United Teachers Los Angeles — has not been nominated as a defendant, but the union is still the target. Complaints blame the school system and police. Austin Beutner has stated that he will “adopt UTLA’s position” and “submit to UTLA’s irrational, illegal, unnecessary and politically motivated demands.”

Boytner, nominated as a defendant with LA Unified, has not attributed the 6-foot standard to the teachers’ union’s request.

The district did not immediately provide comments, but Boytner defended the district’s security measures for its benefits and, if necessary, to build parent and employee trust.

“Our challenge is to convince families that the school is safe, not to find a way to pack more children into the classroom,” Boytner said recently.

The union succeeded in advocating a COVID vaccine for teachers, delaying the possibility of reopening the primary school campus for at least six weeks, with enough time to achieve maximum vaccine immunity before returning to campus.

The union did not respond immediately. However, President Cecily Myart-Cruz frequently acknowledges family difficulties, allowing students to return to campus prematurely and contribute to the spread of illness and death in their families and low-income Latino Americans. He also said that the situation would have worsened. A black community suffering from disproportionateness.

Interviews and findings suggest that there are diverse opinions on all aspects of the debate throughout the vast school system. According to an ongoing district survey, parents in the areas most affected by COVID-19 decided to keep more children at home than parents in the less affected areas.

Similar to the new proceedings in LA, the San Diego County proceedings A group called the parent Assn.. Claimed that the local school system violated Senate Bill 98. The bill protects education funding for the current school year and at the same time states that the school district “provides as much face-to-face instruction as possible.”

In a San Diego case, Judge Cynthia A. Freeland issued a temporary detention order on March 15 to invalidate some of the state’s guidance, including a four-foot separation, and the safety framework is inadequate. “It is selective and ambiguous in its applicability.” The term, and the prescription, is arbitrary. “

The central issue in the LA proceedings is whether another judge in another proceeding is willing to apply Freeland’s legal analysis to LA Unified. Another question is whether the LA proceedings could proceed quickly enough to affect the current academic year ending June 11.

“The intent is to put pressure on the district to have solutions and meaningful face-to-face options by the fall,” the parent group said in an online post.

Under the development of the district’s hybrid program, 61 primary school campuses and 11 early education centers will reopen in the week of April 12. Other elementary schools will follow the week of April 19th, followed by middle and high schools the following week. LA Unified has approximately 1,400 schools and 465,000 students from kindergarten to grade 12.

The school system also faces legal challenges to other aspects of education planning.

In a complaint dated April 1, four parents are seeking damages to the district, the teachers union, and two of their leaders. The proceedings also require the court to order the teachers union to “stop preventing LAUSD from safely returning to face-to-face instruction.” The proceedings were filed with the support of the Freedom Foundation, which is based in Olympia, Washington. This group is critical of the teachers union and is working to persuade members to opt out of dues payments.

Separately, another group of parents filed a lawsuit in September over the quality of distance learning in the school district, claiming that students did not receive sufficient live instruction online.

Parents sue LAUSD, push for wider reopening, no COVID tests Source link Parents sue LAUSD, push for wider reopening, no COVID tests

Related Articles

Back to top button