But Mr. Carger was aware of how the Internet lowered the barriers to attracting consumers. Instead of mediating their activities to national organizations, individuals can initiate and promote their own boycotts. The press reported his protest at the Grand Hyatt, but did not rely on the press to obtain information. He disseminated information about the target on his blog.
They treated Mr. Carger’s boycott as uncoordinated, not as a tactic. Many responded instinctively by celebrating the sacrifice (like those who shout “cancel culture” today). Manchester said this was “free speech, the First Amendment issue.” Bryan Brown — A major single-problem anti-same-sex marriage group led by California Secretary-General of the National Marriage Organization and those closely associated with the leaders of the Catholic Church and The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. — After the Grand Hyatt protest, Mr. Carger boasted that his “bullying” had backfired. In a message to his supporters, “The stunts I made against Doug Manchester were corrected in 24 hours. “We’ve raised $ 100,000 for the idea,” he said. “We encouraged at least 2,000 new marriage supporters to join us.”
But Manchester hasn’t been optimistic for a long time. The following year, he sent an aide to a conference of the International Homosexual Travel Association, offering $ 25,000 in cash and $ 100,000 in hotel credit for withdrawing the boycott. No one seemed to accept the deal, and Carger continued to put pressure on the hotel, persuading the business group to cancel the meeting. At the end of 2010, Manchester was forced to sell the property.
Others on the side of accepting Mr. Carger’s boycott attempted a counterattack. Protect Marriage challenged California’s campaign finance system in federal court and amended the First Amendment by “a systematic attempt to intimidate, intimidate, and harass donors to the Proposal 8 Campaign.” In 2009, the First Amendment sued the state of Maine, claiming that the law requiring the disclosure of donor names was unconstitutional. (The court supported the campaign finance system in both states.)
At the same time, the US Supreme Court opened a channel where businesses could spend freely on campaigns, and Mr. Carger set an example for other online mobs. In the summer of 2010, left-wing activist Tom was a candidate for Republican governor. • The target was urged to refuse a $ 150,000 donation to MN Forward, an independent group formed to sort out Emmer’s corporate funding. Advance Collected 150,000 signatures on anti-target petition, and 44,000 on Facebook page calling for a national boycott as Emmer upheld a constitutional amendment defining marriage between one man and one woman. I expressed my support. In response to this threat, Target CEO Gregg Steinhafel sent an unusual message to his employees that he was “extremely sorry” for approving the donation.
By the time the four-state vote decides to marry in November 2012, it is clear that activists have succeeded in “socially unacceptable to provide large sums of money to deprive minorities.” That was, Carger said. Only five people donated more than $ 100,000 to the 2012 anti-same-sex marriage campaign, and no one was nationally famous.
Even religious denominations responded to new pressure. In Maine, the Catholic parish of Portland, which donated $ 550,000 to pass Question 1, a 2009 voting bill banning same-sex marriage, contributed nothing directly when the problem resurfaced in 2012. Did not. Alan Ashton-Co-founder of WordPerfect. He was the bishop and stake president of the Latter-day Saint Jesus Christian Church and was the grandson of the former Church President — donated $ 1 million to Jesus on the 8th. .. problem.
Opinion | Cancel Culture Works. We Wouldn’t Have Marriage Equality Without It. Source link Opinion | Cancel Culture Works. We Wouldn’t Have Marriage Equality Without It.