Medical malpractice deal could replace ballot measure, still raise monetary awards

A measure designed to vote in California could be withdrawn in November that calls for higher medical unemployment benefits, under an agreement announced today.

Alternatively, the bill would seek to lift the patient’s “economic damage”, or the patient’s pain, or suffering, albeit in an additional way beyond the scope of the election. The bill would eliminate the need for a ballot box.

Under the congressional agreement announced today, effective January 1, 2023, cases involving the death of a patient will have a new limit of $ 350,000, with an increase over the next 10 years to $ 750,000 and a 2% annual turnover for subsequent inflation. Meanwhile, death-related cases will have an additional $ 500,000 limit that will grow over the next 10 years to $ 1 million with a 2% increase over the next year.

California Medical Association sent a letter to its members details of the agreement.

The letter, signed by Dr. Robert E., states that “both sides of the campaign are committed to putting patients first, prioritizing stability over affordable health care, and identifying differences to do. suitable for all California residents. ” Wailes, president of the California Medical Association.

In the letter, Wailes said his organization was working with the Newsom government and parliament to bring this new system into law. “Under the agreement, the plan will be withdrawn from the ballot and this maritime agreement will prevent any costly fighting.”

The ballot measure known as the “Justice for the Injured Patients” was brought from the families of the injured and was supported by Consumer Watchdog and legal counsel. behind. She demanded an increase in compensation for non-economists to about $ 1.2 million. The limit is currently set at $ 250,000 and has been around since 1975.

The ballot box will allow the judge to exceed that limit if the patient dies or suffers a “serious injury,” meaning the injury that left them paralyzed or disabled.

Nick Rowley, a legal counsel who assisted the writer and donated funds to support the measure, said taking legal action by Congress 35 has seen an increase in patients and their families. The law would allow for multiple boundaries – one for the health center and one for the donor, for example. This means that in a non-death case, the patient may be able to take multiple parties responsible and receive over $ 350,000, Rowley said.

“This is a big change and the number will go up,” Rowley said.

Carmen Balber, executive director of Consumer Watchdog, who led the support of the measure, said the decision would actually change access to justice for patients when medical malpractice hurts them. “The reason he was on the ballot was because the families were locked up outside the court; they do not have the ability to estimate how low this measure is. What this agreement is doing is restoring access to justice for patients, ”she said.

Opposing the measure, a coalition of health care providers, including the California Medical Association, has argued that the measure would significantly eliminate the helmet and increase the number of lawsuits filed in the state. They claim that it will result in a shortage of resources for patient care and ultimately increase the cost of health care.

The ballot measure – now turning to accounting – is the latest attempt to change the Injury Injury Compensation Act, signed by Governor Jerry Brown in 1975. The law affirms that while Calilfornia suffering from medical malpractice can recover as much as they need. for medical bills and expenses, their potential non-economic compensation is limited to $ 250,000.

In 2014 such an election standard failed.

The story will be updated.

Medical malpractice deal could replace ballot measure, still raise monetary awards Source link Medical malpractice deal could replace ballot measure, still raise monetary awards

Related Articles

Back to top button