Carbon emissions from JBS, the world’s largest meat packaging company, have soared more than 50 percent in the past five years, according to a new study that reveals the challenge of reducing greenhouse gases in the global food industry.
A study by a number of environmental groups found that the Sao Paulo-based company released 421.6 million tonnes of carbon in 2021, a larger footprint than all of Italy and almost as large as that of the UK.
JBS – who has Pledged to reduce emissions To zero zero by 2040 – denied the accuracy of the numbers, saying the report used “flawed methodology and grossly exaggerated data to make misleading claims.” JBS did not provide its own official numbers for last year.
“Achieving our ambitious net zero target is our top priority… We were transparent about the schedules required to do so,” the company said.
The calculations of the Institute of Agriculture and Commerce Policy based at the Minnesota headquarters used a model developed by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and included emissions from Scope 3, in this case emissions from the growing number of the company’s animals. Global supply chain.
By processing 26.8 million cattle, 46.7 million pigs and 4.9 billion chickens, JBS increased its annual emissions last year to 421.6 million metric tons, up from 280 million metric tons in 2016, according to the study conducted in collaboration with Feedback And an investigation of the environmental group DeSmog website.
“JBS’s ‘zero-zero’ program is riddled with rhetoric and light on details, conveniently ignoring the company’s primary source of emissions: the growing number of animals in its global supply chain,” the groups said. “The number of animals in JBS’s supply chain over the past five years has increased significantly, resulting in a huge increase in emissions.”
Shapali Sharma, director of IATP Europe, said: “They can say we have massively calculated the number of animals, but they need to provide proof of what their numbers are and these should be in the public domain. Personally I feel we have a conservative estimate.”
The report will be a blow to the meat packaging group, which has tried to shed its image as an environmental villain.
For years, the company has been accused of deforestation in the Amazon rainforest by allowing cattle raised on felled land to enter its supply chain. In the last two years it has sought to revamp its reputation by setting a number of environmental targets, including a net zero target.
Many believe that this process has provoked the growing threat of realization from European investors and Product of boycotts From supermarkets like Tesco and Carrefour.
The company said that in 2020 its total emissions were 6.8 million metric tons, but acknowledged that this figure does not include gases from animals in the supply chain. She added that Scope 3 emissions would be included in her calculations in her 2021 report, but did not say when it would be released.
Matthew Hayek, a professor of environmental science at New York University, said the IATP has “a good track record of calculating these emissions accurately.”
“[Their] The model does a good job of accurately capturing most of the supply chain effects they describe here as scope 3. Animal emissions should definitely be considered as part of the supply chain of any agricultural food company. “
Another report by Carolina Ingiza
Meatpacker JBS comes under fire over 50% emissions rise Source link Meatpacker JBS comes under fire over 50% emissions rise