Manhattan Beach adopts Bruce’s Beach history report, which gets backing from academics – Press Telegram

Manhattan Beach City Council this week Bruce Beach History ReportThe committee that wrote it received praise from several professional historians — racist motives expelling black residents to past leaders of seaside towns in the 1920s. We gave more weight to the evidence that led us to.

The Bruce Beach History Advisory Board and its predecessor, the Bruce Beach Task Force History Committee, have spent months researching and editing information about former black-owned seaside resorts for African Americans. ..

Bruce’s Beach Lodge provided blacks with a recreational paradise in the early 20th century when African Americans had no access to the coast. However, Manhattan Beach subsequently blamed Willa and Charles Bruce-owned real estate, as well as other black-owned real estate, and successfully used land expropriation for land expropriation. Much of the land the city took over became green and was eventually renamed Bruce Beach Park. The former lodge property is now owned by Los Angeles County and has a lifeguard station.

When the advisory board completed the report, the panel had the city review the report for free and by several experts who praised the finished product in writing.

The scholars who reviewed the report are:

  • Ariela Gross, John B., Alice R. Sharp USC Gould Law School Professor.
  • Tonikaa Orange, Director of Culture and Equity Project at UCLA Center X.
  • Gay Teres Johnson, Associate Professor of Chikanks and Central American Studies Affiliates, African-American Studies at UCLA.And
  • Darryl Brook, Facilitator and Coach of the UCLA Center X Culture and Equity Project.

“It’s a strong memory of Bruce Beach,” Orange wrote about the report. “I was fascinated by history.”

Orange told the Advisory Board that the report was very thorough and would be shared with the History and Ethnic Studies Department at UCLA Center X.

Gross also praised the 75-page report, putting the actions of Manhattan Beach in the 1920s in a broader context of how blacks were treated in the United States at the time.

“The campaign to drive out black beach fans who culminated in blame and the capture of Bruce Beach was part of a broader campaign for racial cleanup across the United States,” Gross wrote. “Some towns managed to keep black residents out from the beginning, but some towns, like Manhattan Beach, became white towns by expelling black residents who had a foothold there.”

Willa Bruce purchased one plot in 1912 and another in 1920, the report said. In 1924, the city moved to condemn all property in the area, including resorts.

Manhattan Beach News won the land expropriation procedure in 1929. A year later, Manhattan Beach News reported that then-Councilor John F. Jones said that the “residential” of black residents “decreased their wealth to a considerable extent, and the account lost sales, according to a report. I did.

The report includes further context of racial restrictions and racism around Los Angeles and the nation at the time. The city of South Bay has created a policy that does not allow blacks to enter the boundaries of the town after dark.

“The history they wrote is not only careful and wise, but it also closely tracks everything we know about the history of black landowners and Jim Crow in Southern California,” Gross said. I added.

Bruce’s Beach’s history regained attention a year ago when the Juneteenth event took place. The second annual celebration will be held this week.. Efforts have begun to recognize and correct the city’s past actions, with tangible success this year.

Manhattan Beach adopts Bruce’s Beach history report, which gets backing from academics – Press Telegram Source link Manhattan Beach adopts Bruce’s Beach history report, which gets backing from academics – Press Telegram

Related Articles

Back to top button