Local

Judge denies a couple’s divorce

Attorneys are scrambling in a rare ruling in a Kentucky divorce case. Judge Monica Meredith of the Bullitt County Family Court recently refused to allow the divorce and sent the couple back to counseling instead. Doug and Nicole Potts got married for 13 years when they broke up at the end of last year and have since agreed to prioritize their children’s needs over their own. “We are two very mature people, our marriage has collapsed, and we are devoted to our children,” Doug Potts told sister station WLKY. No one expected it to backfire. “There is an atmosphere that you might be able to solve this, and it may be wrong, but I’m experiencing a lot of these things,” Meredith said at a hearing on August 12. rice field. She went on to say, “If I ordered you to settle counseling, would it be beneficial to all of you, or did you go past it?” Nicole Potts replied, “I think we’re past that, which means that this year is a year at this point.” Doug later said he tried to make it work four times. According to Doug, the couple have already spent more than $ 13,000 on counseling and legal fees. “We were already on this path with counseling and it didn’t work,” he said. “So it can be said that it is causing some emotional distress that has been ordered to rehash what broke the marriage and start over, but I need it. Will do anything. ”A specific order issued by the judge states: The dissolution decree requires the court to find that the marriage has been irreparably broken by KRS 403.170, and in Kentucky such an irreparable collapse is the only basis for dissolution. It has become. All chapters of KRS 403 are for “strengthening and maintaining marriage integrity and protecting family relationships.” Very rarely, in this case, the court cannot at this time find that the marriage has been irreparably broken. Frankly, the court said the two parties had lost the ability to communicate with each other about their emotional relationships, and perhaps Nicole’s lawyer, Sidney Bieck, responded to the ruling by saying, “They I am very surprised that the court orders the couple to return to counseling when they are acting with great respect. Each other. Usually the opposite is true: “Dag’s lawyer, Dorothy. Walsh Lipka was similarly stunned. “From my point of view, the judgment was very unexpected. My goal in my practice is to prepare the client for every situation. I talked to the opposite lawyer. Later, we can say that neither of us expected this ruling, “she said. It was probably the most amazing part of the ruling, as no one was actually talking about it, and these parties were separated for quite some time, “said Walsh Lipka. But on Tuesday, Vieck filed another motion to end the marriage. “Interestingly, the judge did not make her order a final order. If it was not final, anyone in the lawyer or legal community was asked to file a formal appeal,” she said. .. At the next hearing, as the couple process the decision and wait, Doug says they will continue to keep the judge’s orders. “Sometimes people lose track of what is best for their children, and we have decided not to do it for our daughter,” he said. Both lawyers agree that the selfless behavior and commitment to prioritize children is exactly what the couple should do, and say that it should not be mistaken for anything else. “It’s really important to see this and say,’Because we’re mature adults and polite to each other, this is a great, key to having another family,'” said Walsh Lipka. “Because you are still a family member.” So what does this mean for the future? I don’t know yet, but Vieck said it wasn’t ideal for divorce seekers. “If this is supported as some valid precedent for the future, it will be a tragedy for all citizens of the state,” she said. “I mean it will be completely disastrous.” You can read Meredith’s full ruling here.

Attorneys are scrambling in a rare ruling in a Kentucky divorce case.

Judge Monica Meredith of the Bullitt County Family Court recently refused to allow the divorce and sent the couple back to counseling instead.

Doug and Nicole Potts got married for 13 years when they broke up at the end of last year and have since agreed to prioritize their children’s needs over their own.

“We are two very mature people and our marriage has collapsed. We are devoted to our children,” Doug Potts told sister station WLKY.

The heartfelt behavior was praised by lawyers from both parties. No one expected it to backfire.

“There is an atmosphere that you might be able to solve this, and it may be wrong, but I’m experiencing a lot of these things,” Meredith said at a hearing on August 12. rice field.

She went on to say, “If I ordered you to settle counseling, would it be beneficial to all of you, or did you pass it?”

Nicole Potts replied, “I think we’re past that, which means that this year is a year at this point.”

Doug later said he tried to make it work four times.

According to Doug, the couple have already spent more than $ 13,000 on counseling and legal fees. “We were already on this path with counseling and it didn’t work,” he said. “So it can be said that it is causing some emotional distress that has been ordered to rehash what broke the marriage and start over, but I need it. Will do anything. “

A specific order issued by the judge states:

“Before entering the dissolution decree, the court was required by KRS 403.170 to find that the marriage was irreparably broken, and in Kentucky such an irreparable collapse was dissolved. The only rationale, however, is that KRS 403.110 also enforces dissolution. The court frees all chapters of KRS 403 to “strengthen and maintain the integrity of marriage and protect family relationships.” Interpret in. This is very unusual, but in this case, the court, at this time, this marriage frankly, the court lost the ability of these parties to communicate with each other about their emotional relationships, and perhaps their pride. Admits that they are the two who made the wall between them. “”

Nicole’s lawyer, Sydney Bieck, responded to the ruling by saying, “I’m pretty surprised that the court orders the couple to return to counseling when they are acting very politely to each other. Usually the opposite. That is true. “”

Doug’s lawyer, Dorothy Walsh Lipka, was similarly stunned. “In my view, the decision was very unexpected. My goal in my practice is to prepare the client for every situation. After discussing with the opposite lawyer, both of us anticipate this decision. I didn’t, “she said.

In addition to counseling, the judge also ordered that neither party should introduce the benefits of dating to the child until the proceedings are completed. “It’s probably the most amazing part of the decision, as no one was actually talking about it, and these parties have been separated for quite some time,” said Walsh Lipka.

The couple were ordered to seek counseling until mid-October, and at a future hearing they proved to the court that they had tried again. But on Tuesday, Vieck filed another motion to dissolve the marriage.

“Interestingly, the judge did not make her order a final order, and if it is not final, there is no way for anyone in the lawyer or the legal community to file a formal appeal,” she says. I did. “So I set it aside and petitioned the judge to enter the decree at that time.”

Vieck expects that decision to come on September 13.

Doug says they will continue to uphold the judge’s orders while the couple processes the decision and waits for the next hearing. “Sometimes people lose track of what is best for their children, and we have decided not to do it for our daughter,” he said.

Both lawyers agree that the selfless behavior and commitment to prioritize children is exactly what the couple should do, and say that it should not be mistaken for anything else.

“It’s really important to see this and say,’Because we’re mature adults and polite to each other, this is a great, key to having another family,'” said Walsh Lipka. “Because you are still a family.”

So what does this mean for the future? I don’t know yet, but Vieck said it wasn’t ideal for divorce seekers. “If this is supported as some valid precedent for the future, it will be a tragedy for all citizens of the state,” she said. “I think it’s completely miserable.”

Meredith’s full ruling can be read here.

Judge denies a couple’s divorce Source link Judge denies a couple’s divorce

Related Articles

Back to top button