Is digital health just for the rich?

Credit: Pixabay / CC0 Domain Public

Despite COVID-19 forcing weak governments and healthcare organizations to update, upgrade and take care of digital healthcare equipment, mHealth is reaching out to the poorest and most needy. so far, sad on the ground, according to the review published today in Annual Public Health Survey. Annual review today announces plans to make all 51 magazines open access to the new product.

“Mobile Health (Mhealth) in Expensive Countries (Lmics)” explores the potential for globalization of mobile phones to reach the population. It highlights the benefits that private equity investments offer to the field: value through capacity building, technological advancement and the ability to integrate and develop. consumer need because real-time, reasonable, relevant, and selected health care options. At the same time, the authors raise questions about whether honesty, home ownership, equity, and safety can be supported in the current healthcare business environment.

Although mHealth in High-Performance Countries (HICs) is becoming more common, evidence of improvement, sustainable growth in LMICs is not well established. This variability is a product of a still natural tendency to invest in pilots who fail to reach the balance (and are not published) without sustainable resource management due to lack of support programs. for a long time.

From current research, mHealth in LMICs is focused on two aspects: using mHealth for support. health workers in delivering health services and using mHealth for delivery health information directly to users and supporting behavior change in disease management services.

However, this is about to change. Large, underutilized, and consumer classes in emerging economies coupled with hanging in consumer choice for health care as the COVID-19 disaster intensified its growth in mHealth in LMICs.

The authors highlight the importance of WHO Digital Health Strategies (2020-2025) and many of its principles that are relevant to mHealth in LMICs, in particular, sound demand. process design for activities related to efficiency, equity, ethics, accounting, and governance.

One-two and two-way messaging has become the most widely used system, with a gradual shift to using apps and social networking sites (Facebook Messenger, WhatsApp, and WeChat).

The main obstacle to the implementation of mHealth in the LMICs was the lack of technical capacity and capability, with technical support being exported to other countries, resulting in limited sustainability. At the same time, domestic investment, especially when sponsorships are supported by this initiative, is an important factor in defining the transition from pilot to domestic financing program. This change, which is part of a larger agenda in global health care subsidies, is likely to have a significant impact on the sustainability of other projects that fall outside of primary care facilities and service facilities until they are disbursed. value translation (of digital health), testing. , and received (as not a helper to the delivery of routine health care services).

Research shows that perhaps the biggest brake on optimism surrounding mHealth is the issue of consistency: who gets the chance and gets the benefit. It suggests that organizations with access to resources (both technical and financial) are more likely to be the first to adopt new technologies while describing the export of electric vehicles as such an environment.

The most obvious and well-defined hazards, reviews show, are related to the confidentiality and confidentiality of data or personal health information through mobile devices. The application detection on mobile phones during a COVID-19 disaster is a good example.

In light of these challenges and the growing evidence of market growth in LMICs including scale (large), human capital (youth, population), weak standards, and medium-sized, the review is increasingly controversial. that the future of digital health in LMICS it can be highly correlated to ensure public-private partnerships (PPP).

Meet the needs of ventilators in small and medium-sized countries

Learn more:
Phone Health (mHealth) in Small and Medium Countries, Annual Public Health Survey (2022). DOI: 10.1146 / 052620-093850

Annual Review

hint: Is digital health just for the rich? (2022, April 5) Retrieved 5 April 2022 from

This document is copyrighted. Apart from any genuine transaction for the purpose of personal analysis or investigation, any part may not be reproduced without our written permission. Content is provided for informational purposes only.

Is digital health just for the rich? Source link Is digital health just for the rich?

Related Articles

Back to top button