Local

How Attorneys Narrow Down Who Gets To Be A Juror

How lawyers narrow down who will be a jury



SOLEDAD: 12 people, one decision. Over the past few weeks, I’ve seen juries verdict on high-profile CAS. There is a jury in these decisions that will determine how they work in SPOTLIT. The sixth amendment of our Constitution gives Americans the right to a trial by a jury in the jury’s selection, and prosecutors and lawyers reveal beliefs and biases that could harm the jury. Raise a series of questions to potential juries for who do they want? There, a jury consultant will participate. CHRISTINA MARINAKIS is a JYUR consultant for IMS LITIGA ONTIDR. CHRISTINA MARINAKIS, NICTO HAVE YOU WITH ME. I found the concept after consulting with the jury that it was very attractive. Give me a sense of how the process got worse. DR. Marinakis: Often when you talk to the jury after the trial, they look like me, why did you choose me? ANID didn’t say I chose you. There are many ways to dismiss a jury because, through a personal hardship, the jury cannot participate in a trial of that length or may be useful due to potential bias. Please put it aside. SOLEDAD: What do you look for in a jury? Is there anyone who is clearly prejudiced and has to go, like after overcoming a hardship? DR. Marinakis: We are actually trying to find out who the worst jury is. The idea that you really want to hide your best jury, it’s almost unintuitive. You don’t want to identify who your best jury is. Because the other side is just trying to get rid of them. So we participate in the jury selection, we hope you have it in your heart, what is the absolute worst jury profile? And the way I explain this is that we all have lenses in the way we see the world, and Tsehorens was shaped by the value of a lifetime of experience. SOLEDAD: You can go back to this IA and dismiss many juries. Can you explain where it came from and why you do so? What I mean is that it’s kind of random to me and I think it’s a bit unfair. DR. Marinakis: That’s-in fact the fairest thing. Ultimately, people are not always aware of their prejudices. SOLEDAD: How lawyers frame Questy Tono is considered by future juries-quite-quite important. That’s a pretty critique you know, how does framing work? DR. Marinakis: That’s why juries hire consultants like themselves, and if you want the jury to admit these prejudices, how many people feel XYZ, as all opponents feel. You should ask people. When you say “everyone feels”, it has this implication that this is not a proper belief. Does everyone feel this way because this is the wrong way to go? When you say “how many of you are feeling”, it’s like a welcome, but I realize that many people feel this way. SOLEDAD: A trial focused on Kirinov’s Arbury, which was of interest to many. It was one black man and eleven white men. And you’re talking about the Deep South. How does that happen? DR. Marinakis: Part of it is STJU PLAIN LK.UC, a number game. When you sit in the jury, there is something called a random list, so each jury sits in turn, and with a random chance, you head towards the end of the list rather than pulling in front of the list. We have an African-American jury, JUST BY CHANCEAL ONE. You’re going to confuse it. P The other part of it goes hardship. And this is really unfortunate. Our jury system does not pay the jury too much for the jury’s mission. As you know, it can be up to $ 40 a day, but in many places it’s only $ 8 a day. SOLEDAD: Is Diversity Useful for Prosecution and Defense? DR. Marinakis: The more diversified the jury, the longer it takes to deliberate, see the evidence closer, and the law closer. There are some CAEDGROUPTHINK errors. That is when there are groups of the same kind, groups that are very similar to each other. They want to get along with people like them, so they agree to get along. They tend to go with who the leader is or the majority and don’t really delve into things. When you have a variety of juries, research has shown that these juries have been deliberating longer. They look at the jury’s instructions more often and seek and seek evidence more often. And the “E” is a study that is virtually less error-prone than a jury of the same kind.And on which side is the merit?

How lawyers narrow down who will be a jury


All Americans are entitled to a trial by a jury of their peers, and that right is guaranteed by Article 6 of the Constitutional Amendment. Before the opening discussion begins, the prosecution and defense lawyers elect a jury. To reach the final twelve, each legal team asks a series of questions to ensure that the jury does not have any prejudices or prejudices that could damage their proceedings. Christina Markinakis is a jury consultant for IMS Litigation. Soledad tells her how to identify the person who most sympathizes with the case.

All Americans are entitled to a trial by a jury of their peers, and that right is guaranteed by Article 6 of the Constitutional Amendment. Before the opening discussion begins, the prosecution and defense lawyers elect a jury. To reach the final twelve, each legal team asks a series of questions to ensure that the jury does not have any prejudices or prejudices that could damage their proceedings. Christina Markinakis is a jury consultant for IMS Litigation. Soledad tells her how to identify the person who most sympathizes with the case.

How Attorneys Narrow Down Who Gets To Be A Juror Source link How Attorneys Narrow Down Who Gets To Be A Juror

Related Articles

Back to top button