Local

Heard seeks to throw out verdict in Depp defamation trial

Amber Heard’s lawyers have asked a judge to throw out the $10.35 million verdict against her in the defamation case filed by ex-husband Johnny Depp, arguing that the verdict was not supported by the evidence and that one of the jurors could had not been properly checked. from the court.In post-trial motions filed Friday, Heard’s attorneys call the jury’s June 1 award of $10 million in compensatory and $5 million in punitive damages to Depp “excessive” and “indefensible.” They are asking the judge to vacate the verdict and dismiss Depp’s lawsuit or order a new trial. Immediately after the verdict, the judge reduced the damages to $350,000 with a state cap. Depp sued Heard for defamation in Fairfax County court over a December 2018 Washington Post op-ed describing herself as a “public figure representing domestic abuse.” Depp’s lawyers claimed she was defamed by the article. , though she never mentioned him by name. The six-week televised trial turned into a spectacle that offered a window into their dysfunctional marriage. Much of the testimony focused on Heard’s claims that she had been physically and sexually abused by Depp. Heard described more of a dozen alleged assaults, including an altercation in Australia – where Depp was filming the Pirates of the Caribbean sequel – in which Depp lost the tip of his middle finger and Heard said she was sexually assaulted with a liquor bottle. said that he never hit Heard and that she was the abuser. Depp had to prove all that he never attacked Heard, that her article defamed him, and that she wrote the article with actual malice. In their post-trial motions, Heard was legal. The team argued that to find that Heard had actual malice, Depp would she had to show that at the time Heard’s article was published, she did not believe she had been abused.” of abuse at the hands of Mr. Depp,” Heard’s attorneys state in their motion. Heard’s attorneys are also asking the judge to investigate “possible improper juror service,” arguing that one of the jurors selected to serve on the jury was listed as born in 1945 in documents given to attorneys prior to the jury selection process. juror, but is listed as born in 1970 in publicly available information.” This discrepancy raises the question of whether Juror 15 actually received a summons for jury duty and was properly vetted by the Court to serve on the jury,” her attorneys said Heard in their application. Depp’s lawyers did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The court also awarded Heard $2 million in her counterclaim against Depp, finding that Heard was defamed by one of Depp’s lawyers. who accused her of creating an elaborate hoax that involved defacing the couple’s apartment to make them look worse to the police. In some ways, the trial was a repeat of a lawsuit Depp filed in the U.K. against a British tabloid after he was described as a “wife beater.” The judge in that case ruled in favor of the paper in 2020, after finding that Heard said the truth in her descriptions of abuse.

Amber Heard’s lawyers have asked a judge to throw out the $10.35 million verdict against her in the defamation case filed by ex-husband Johnny Depp, arguing that the verdict was not supported by the evidence and that one of the jurors could had not been properly checked. from the court.

In subsequent lawsuits filed Friday, Heard’s lawyers call the jury’s June 1 award of $10 million in compensatory damages and $5 million in punitive damages to Depp “excessive” and “indefensible.” They are asking the judge to vacate the verdict and dismiss Depp’s lawsuit or order a new trial. Immediately after the verdict, the judge reduced the damages to $350,000 with a state cap.

Depp sued Heard for defamation in Fairfax County District Court over a December 2018 Washington Post op-ed describing herself as a “public figure representing domestic abuse.” Depp’s lawyers claimed he was defamed by the article, even though it never mentioned him by name.

The six-week televised trial turned into a spectacle that offered a window into their dysfunctional marriage. Much of the testimony focused on Heard’s claims that she had been physically and sexually abused by Depp. Heard described more than a dozen alleged assaults, including an altercation in Australia — where Depp was filming the Pirates of the Caribbean sequel — in which Depp lost the tip of his middle finger and Heard said she was sexually assaulted with a bottle drink.

Depp said he never hit Heard and that she was the abuser.

Depp had to prove that he never attacked Heard, that her article defamed him, and that he wrote the article with actual malice.

In their post-trial motions, Heard’s legal team argued that in order to establish that Heard had actual malice, Depp had to prove that at the time Heard’s article was published, she did not believe she had been abused.

“To the contrary, the evidence overwhelmingly supported Ms. Heard’s belief that she was the victim of abuse at the hands of Mr. Depp,” Heard’s lawyers said in their motion.

Heard’s attorneys are also asking the judge to investigate “potential improper juror service,” arguing that one of the jurors selected to serve on the jury was listed as born in 1945 in documents provided to attorneys prior to the jury selection process , but is listed as born in 1970 in publicly available information.

“This discrepancy raises the question of whether Superintendent 15 actually received a summons for jury duty and was properly vetted by the Court to serve on the jury,” Heard’s attorneys said in their motion.

Depp’s lawyers did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

The court also awarded Heard $2 million in her counterclaim against Depp, finding that Heard was defamed by one of Depp’s lawyers, who accused her of creating an elaborate hoax that included defacing the couple’s apartment to make her look worse for the police.

In some ways, the trial was a repeat of a lawsuit Depp filed in the UK against a British tabloid after he was described as a “wife beater”. The judge in that case ruled in favor of the newspaper in 2020 after finding that Heard was telling the truth in her accounts of abuse.

Heard seeks to throw out verdict in Depp defamation trial Source link Heard seeks to throw out verdict in Depp defamation trial

Related Articles

Back to top button