At one time it was considered an occasion to spend a lot in an elegant restaurant. Slob culture then gained momentum, and even though an establishment put a lot of effort into arranging flowers, ironing tablecloths, and providing formal service, customers showed up with neat sweatshirts and sneakers.
Standard outfits for luxury dining began to decline a few decades ago, but the pandemic hit them harder. Back in the health crisis, top restaurants are looking to re-establish themselves by establishing (or re-establishing) dress code. Olivetta, Los Angeles, has issued a warning: “The sweet fashion dress code is very full.” Houston’s Thirteen management – “our wallpaper is Gucci” – also announced that customers with T-shirts and sweatpants would not be welcome.
Good for those who defend the decorum, and for those who are angry with the wicked.
The drawbacks are weak, if not false. But let’s hit them anyway.
First of all, dress codes are not about money. J. Crew sells navy jackets for $ 199, while Nordstrom ripped jeans are a whopping $ 258. And not all elegant outfits are based on expensive tailoring. Some have just the style, the ability to pair elegant outfits with mid-priced pieces. The right clothes can be found at Target, as well as at Neiman Marcus.
Dress codes are not about race. To say that they are racist is inherently racist. It’s no secret that many of the most elegant men and women in any downtown area are black. And who could match the black church ladies with their beautiful suits and hats to shine?
There have been unfortunate reports, for example, that a restaurant rejected a black customer with a track outfit while admitting a similarly dressed white man. The remedy is better trained staff.
Dress codes are not about the class. Conversely, dressing in high-end restaurants can take on the air of reverse slumming. Call it “Slobbism”. You see people who have just cleaned the garage fingering their servers in uniforms that provide professional service.
Given the demographics of the kitchen staff who are preparing the bubble, and many of the staff dressed in front of the house, how it is presented can take on an air of class dominance, sometimes with race. sub-tones.
Dress code is also about showing respect to the diners at the next table. When did we make the people around us invisible?
To some extent, we can blame it on a network culture where we know what we see on the screen, knowing that in most cases, no one is looking back. In this way, we forget that in live performances — be it in a restaurant or in a theater — the audience is part of the show.
With the decline of community home dining, many have missed out on great offerings such as Thanksgiving or a wedding party. Days and weeks melt into a long blah that can be extended to an expensive dinner at a great restaurant.
As for the legality of dress codes, yes, they are legal. Those who comply with them are private companies. They have the right to set standards of conduct, including dress code.
Of course, there are no fashion cops with T-shirts with the common word for arresting wealthy farmers or T-shirts with baseball caps on their backs. Such diners still have plenty of options, and many of them offer good food. Anyone who can afford these restaurants can welcome them, and that’s okay.
Remember that dress codes promote respect, not exclusion. And even the most informal places can put up signs that say, “No shoes, no shirts, no services.”
Follow Froma Harrop on Twitter @FromaHarrop. You can contact him firstname.lastname@example.org.
FROMA HARROP: Dress codes are about respect, not money | Breaking Source link FROMA HARROP: Dress codes are about respect, not money | Breaking