Local

First day of Florida lawsuit hearing in death of Gabby Petito

Brian Laundrie’s family held their first hearing Wednesday afternoon in court over a lawsuit filed by Gabby Petito’s parents over damages related to her death. Brian Laundrie’s parents filed a motion to dismiss. Laundry attendants do not attend private sessions. One of their lawyers, Steve Bertolino, attended almost, while his opponent, Matthew Luka, appeared in person. Luke argues that although Petito’s family claimed that the laundresses were responsible for speaking out during the investigation into Gabby Petito’s disappearance, they did not have the right to speak. I have more needs than talking about this information. They don’t have to share it, “said Luke. Petito’s family lawyer Patrick Reilly argues that the case is not just about the laundrymen ‘s silence, but also about what happened and the information they had. “They didn’t just stop. Brian Laundrie came home in Gabby Petito’s car alone to his family, relatives who knew Gabby was dead, they knew his son had killed her, they knew where the body was, especially knowing that Joseph Petito and Nicole Schmidt were there. they want to know where their daughter is. They went on vacation, “said Reilly. Gabby Petito’s body was found in a Wyoming park and Brian Laundrie was found in a Florida museum with a notebook claiming to have killed her. He died by suicide. Joseph Petito and Nichole Schmidt sued Christopher and Roberta Laundrie for more than $ 30,000 in damages and attorneys’ fees, the lawsuit alleges. when they do not, they “behave badly or behave badly or neglect” to their rights. as terrifying, abusive, and unbearable in a civilized society, “according to the lawsuit. Prosecutors say they have suffered as a direct result of these actions. Laundrie’s family lawyer , Steve Bertolino, responds to WPBF 25 requests for comment yes.” law, ”Bertolino said in a statement. “Considering everything Petitos alleges in their case is true, which we deny, this case does not change the fact that the laundresses are not responsible for speaking to the Law or any third party. including Petito’s family. This law makes Petitos. ‘they claim to have no basis in law. ” Laundrie’s family has filed a motion to dismiss the case, claiming several reasons. According to the complaint, too many media outlets were considered to cause dissatisfaction in court. Laundry Lawyer. He also stated that “the constitutional right of the Laundries to be silent, confidential and representative of the council,” which were the first amendments, the fifth and the sixth, were the reasons Petitos claimed to be concerned about worry. the complaint concludes that because of its constitutional right to remain silent, the lack of laundry can no longer be considered as “bad” and is cut off in part. dge.The Laundries also claimed that the incident took place several months ago and Petitos’ claim to search for their daughter’s body was dismissed. Bertolino issued the following statement: “The motion to dismiss Gabby Petito’s parents has been filed in court. The washermen exercised their constitutional right to freedom of expression and relied on a lawyer to represent them. This is not only a common practice in our civilized society but also includes the exercise of fundamental rights under the US and Florida constitutions. The rights of the laundresses are unlimited and the laundresses will never be liable for exercising their legal rights in a lawful manner. “I and my colleagues at Trombley & Hanes, who represent Chris and Roberta Laundrie in this matter, are confident that the constitutional rights of all citizens will be protected by dismissing this lawsuit.”

Brian Laundrie’s family held their first court hearing on Wednesday evening, following a lawsuit filed by Gabby Petito’s parents over damages related to her death.

Brian Laundrie’s parents filed a motion to dismiss the case.

Laundry attendants do not attend private sessions. One of their lawyers, Steve Bertolino, attended almost, while his adviser, Matthew Luka, appeared in person.

The judge questioned Luke several times during the course of the debate. Luke argues that although Petito’s family claimed that the laundresses were responsible for speaking out during the investigation into Gabby Petito’s disappearance, they did not have the right to speak.

“My argument is that even if Brian Laundrie gave the information to his parents, they would have no other choice than to talk about it. They don’t have to share it,” Luke said.

Petito’s family lawyer Patrick Reilly argues that the case is not only about the laundromats, but also about what happened and the information they have.

“It simply came to our notice then. Brian Laundrie came home in Gabby Petito’s car alone to his family home, relatives knew Gabby was dead, they knew his son had killed her, they knew where the body was, and especially, knowing that Joseph Petito and Nicole Schmidt were in extreme anxiety. learn where their daughter is. They went on vacation, “Reilly said.

Gabby Petito’s body remained found in a Wyoming park and Brian Laundrie was later found in a Florida store da a the textbook claims to have killed her. He died by suicide.

Joseph Petito and Nichole Schmidt have indicted Christopher and Roberta Laundrie on charges of damages exceeding $ 30,000 and attorneys’ fees, the statement said.

Plaintiffs allege that the laundresses knew the whereabouts of Gabby Petito’s body, and without saying what happened, they “acted cruelly or behaved negligently” for their rights. Their behavior “reflects a vicious cycle that involves behavior, under conditions, which transcends all boundaries of politeness and is regarded as scary, unsympathetic, and unbearable in in a civilized society, ”according to the lawsuit.

Plaintiffs allege that they suffered as a result of these actions directly.

Laundrie’s family lawyer, Steve Bertolino, responded to WPBF 25’s request for comment.

“As I have confirmed over the past several months, laundromats have not spoken openly about my orders which is their right under the law,” Bertolino said in a statement. “Considering everything Petitos alleges in their case is true, which we deny, this case does not change the fact that the laundresses are not responsible for speaking to the Law or any third party. including Petito’s family. This law makes Petitos. ‘he claims to have no basis in law. “

Laundrie’s family has filed a motion to dismiss the case, citing other reasons.

According to the complaint, the media is often overlooked which will lead to prejudice in court.

The laundromat’s attorney also stated that “the constitutional right of the Laundries to be silent, private and representative of the lawyers,” which were the first amendments, the fifth and the sixth, were the reasons Petitos claimed to be concerned. at heart.

In specific legal reasons for a heart attack, the plaintiff concludes that because of the Constitution’s right to remain silent, a lack of laundry may not be “reasonable” and the judge so determined.

The washermen also claimed that the incident took place several months ago and Petitos’ claim to search for their daughter’s body was dismissed.

Bertolino, issued the following statement:

“Gabby Petito’s parents have filed a motion to dismiss. The washermen exercised their constitutional right to freedom of expression and relied on a lawyer to represent them. This is not only a common practice in our civilized society but also includes the exercise of fundamental rights under the US and Florida constitutions. The rights of the laundresses are unlimited and the laundresses will never be liable for exercising their legal rights in a lawful manner. “I and my colleagues at Trombley & Hanes, who represent Chris and Roberta Laundrie in this matter, are confident that the constitutional rights of all citizens will be protected by dismissing this lawsuit.”

First day of Florida lawsuit hearing in death of Gabby Petito Source link First day of Florida lawsuit hearing in death of Gabby Petito

Related Articles

Back to top button