Equal is better? How people think COVID-19 vaccines should be shared worldwide

Credit: Pixabay / CC0 Domain Public

COVID-19 meningitis has changed the world dramatically. It also raises a number of new questions. The fact that vaccines can be produced, produced and distributed in times of global health crisis is a completely new phenomenon. But what criteria should be used to distribute this drug? Inadequate equipment and inadequate global distribution power put this question at the forefront. A research team from Göttingen University conducted a representative survey in Germany and the United States in June 2021 to find out how the public feels about this. The results are published in the journal Vaccination.

The researchers created a questionnaire for measurement public opinion about the world prevention dismantle. They surveyed a total of about 2,000 people, representatives of the German and American populations. For example, distribution tests with a large number of vaccines to be administered by participants and the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method were used. AHP evaluates individual decision-making criteria for distribution of prevention on other criteria in a series of two wise comparisons. “In particular, we are very interested in people’s honesty about such answers and decisions,” said Dr. Ida Monfared, co-author of the study, Center for Modern Indian Studies (CeMIS) at Göttingen University. So, distribution prevention The decision was re-evaluated consciously when it was a question of individual immunization or family immunization. Particular attention has been paid to the issue of division between the northern and southern countries of the country.

People in Germany and the United States prefer to distribute COVID-19 vaccine in accordance with the principle of “medical emergency” (Germany: 49.4%, US: 37.4%) and the principle of “equal opportunity for everyone” (Germany: 25.4%, United States: 32.7%). Other possible criteria for distribution, such as according to national development and capacity for vaccines, or according to the rules of the free market and therefore according to the purchasing power of the countries, there is hardly any support available in Germany or the United States (less than 15% of the vote in any case).

“It is surprising to note that there are such programs for the distribution of antibiotics, especially considering that at the time of the study in mid-2021, there is still no solid evidence on the risk of viral differences in COVID. -19 “Vaccination strategies should be developed globally and quickly,” said Professor Matthias Klumpp from Göttingen University.

Researchers have found that a balanced distribution of COVID-19 vaccine may pose a risk in different regions

Learn more:
Matthias Klumpp et al, Public Opinion on Global COVID-19 Vaccination Distribution: Evidence from two national representatives in Germany and the United States, Vaccination (2022). DOI: 10.1016 / j. immunization.2022.02.084

Its formation
Göttingen University

hint: Exactly better? How People Think COVID-19 should be distributed worldwide (2022, March 28) Retrieved 28 March 2022 from worldwide.html

This document is copyrighted. Apart from any genuine transaction for the purpose of personal analysis or investigation, no part may be reproduced without our written permission. Content is provided for informational purposes only.

Equal is better? How people think COVID-19 vaccines should be shared worldwide Source link Equal is better? How people think COVID-19 vaccines should be shared worldwide

Related Articles

Back to top button