Local

Each count the Depp-Heard jurors considered before issuing a verdict

As a public figure, Johnny Depp faced a high bar to win his defamation lawsuit against Amber Heard’s ex-wife. According to seven unanimous jurors, he cleared it. Depp said that his ex-wife slandered him in a 2018 newspaper, in which he hinted at allegations of abuse against Depp. His name was never mentioned. The Virginia Civil Court ruled in Depp’s favor on all three charges Wednesday, saying Herd had not only made false and defamatory statements, but had done so with “real malice” – a higher limit for public affairs cases. . Jurors concluded that Depp should have received more than $ 10 million. However, Depp’s victory was not absolute. The jurors also concluded that part of Heard’s counterclaim was well founded. They denied two of Herd’s three allegations, but found that she had been defamed by a Depp’s lawyer, who accused her of raping their apartment to make it look worse for police. The jury awarded her $ 2 million. A look at every count taken by jurors: First count by HeardJurors The jurors examined whether Depp was discredited by the online headline in the Washington Post: “I spoke out against sexual violence – and confronted our culture. This must change.” Heard’s attorneys argued that he did not write the title, but jurors concluded that Heard “made or published it” and that it was defamatory. “Two years later, I became a public figure representing domestic abuse, and I felt the full force of our culture’s rage against women who speak openly.” violence in 2016. Herd’s lawyers said a mountain of evidence showed that Herd was abused several times and that only one case Proven abuse would make the line not defamatory. They also argued that the statement was objectively true because it did not focus on Depp, but on Herd’s experience of speaking openly. The jurors disagreed, considering the statement defamatory. Third count against Herd In a second excerpt from the article, Herd wrote: “I have rarely had the privilege of seeing, in real time, how institutions protect men accused of abuse.” Depp’s lawyers reiterated And, as with the other two accusations, jurors found that Herd had defamed Depp with “real malice” – there was clear and convincing evidence that Herd either knew it was a lie or acted with a reckless contempt for the truth. The first count against Depp Heard leveled three counts of defamation against Depp, saying he had been repeatedly defamed by his former lawyer, Adam Waldman, who denounced Heard’s allegations of abuse. Jurors considered a statement by Waldman that appeared on the Daily Mail website on April 8, 2020: “Amber Heard and friends “They have used false media allegations of sexual violence both as a sword and as a shield. The jury concluded that Heard’s lawyers had not proved all the evidence of defamation. The second count against Depp Heard marked its only victory in a statement given by Waldman to the Daily Mail. He accused Herd and her friends of making abuse allegations after a 2016 brawl at the couple’s Hollywood penthouse that prompted Herd to call police. The statement said: “It was just an ambush, a hoax. They set up Mr. Depp calling the police, but the first attempt failed. The police officers came to the penthouses, searched thoroughly and interviewed and left after not seeing any damage to the person or property. So Amber and her friends poured some wine and pulled over, took their stories straight under the guidance of a lawyer and a journalist and then called 911. “Two police officers testified that they saw no signs of Herd being injured, although she appeared in public. with a mark on her face a few days later Jurors agreed with Heard’s lawyers that Waldman’s statement was false and defamatory and that he had acted with real malice. in the same article: Herd v. Johnny Depp.

As a public figure, Johnny Depp faced a high bar to win his defamation lawsuit against Amber Heard’s ex-wife. According to seven unanimous jurors, he cleared it.

Depp said that his ex-wife slandered him in an article in the 2018 newspaper, in which he referred to allegations of abuse against Depp. His name was never mentioned.

The Virginia Civil Court ruled in Depp’s favor on all three charges Wednesday, saying Herd had not only made false and defamatory statements, but had done so with “real malice” – a higher limit for public affairs cases. . Jurors concluded that Depp should have received more than $ 10 million.

However, Depp’s victory was not absolute. The jurors also concluded that part of Heard’s counterclaim was well founded. They denied two of Herd’s three allegations, but found that she had been defamed by a Depp’s lawyer, who accused her of raping their apartment to make it look worse for police. The jury awarded her $ 2 million.

A look at every measurement examined by jurors:

First count against Herd

The jury considered whether Depp was discredited by the online headline of the Washington Post article: “I spoke out against sexual violence – and I faced the rage of our culture. That needs to change.”

Heard’s lawyers argued that he did not write the title.

But jurors concluded that Heard “made or published” it and that it was defamatory.

Second count against Herd

The jurors considered the author’s third paragraph: “Then, two years ago, I became a public figure representing domestic abuse and felt the full rage of our culture for women who speak openly.”

Depp’s lawyers said he was clearly referring to Depp, as Herd publicly accused him of domestic violence in 2016.

Herd’s lawyers said that a wealth of evidence showed that Herd had been abused many times and that only one case of proven abuse would make the line non-defamatory. They also argued that the statement was objectively true because it did not focus on Depp, but on Herd’s experience of speaking openly.

The jurors disagreed, considering the statement defamatory.

Third countdown against Herd

In a second excerpt from the op-ed, Heard wrote, “I have seldom had the privilege of seeing, in real time, how institutions protect men accused of abuse.”

Depp’s lawyers said again that he was clearly referring to Depp.

And, as with the other two allegations, jurors found that Herd had defamed Depp with “real malice” – there was clear and convincing evidence that Herd either knew he was a liar or acted with reckless contempt for the truth.

First count against Depp

Hurd has filed three counts of defamation against Depp, saying he had been repeatedly slandered by Adam Waldman’s former lawyer, who called Hurd’s abuse allegations a hoax. Heard said the comments hurt her career.

The jury considered a statement by Waldman that appeared on the Daily Mail website on April 8, 2020: “Amber Heard and her friends in the media use false allegations of sexual violence as both a sword and a shield according to their needs. They have chosen some of “Her prank on sexual violence is” facts “like the sword, causing them to the public and to Mr. Depp”.

The jury concluded that Heard’s lawyers had not proved all the evidence of defamation.

Second count against Depp

Herd scored her only victory in a statement given by Waldman to the Daily Mail. He accused Herd and her friends of making allegations of abuse after a 2016 altercation at the couple’s Hollywood penthouse that prompted Herd to call police.

The statement said: “It was simply an ambush, a hoax. They set up Mr Depp and called the police, but the first attempt failed. “In the person or property. So Amber and her friends poured some wine and made the place, got their stories straight under the guidance of a lawyer and journalists and then called 911.”

Two police officers testified that they saw no signs of Herd being injured, although she appeared in public with a mark on her face a few days later asking for a temporary restraining order.

The jurors agreed with Heard’s lawyers that Waldman’s statement was false and defamatory and that he had acted with real malice.

Third countdown against Depp

The final count against Waldman included a statement from the same article: “We have reached the beginning of the end of Ms. Herd’s abuse of Johnny Depp.”

The jury concluded that Heard’s lawyers had not proven the statement to be defamatory.

Each count the Depp-Heard jurors considered before issuing a verdict Source link Each count the Depp-Heard jurors considered before issuing a verdict

Related Articles

Back to top button