Doctors are reviewing advances in gender equality in British medicine, recommending the results of a study published in an open journal. BMJ Open.
The recruitment of gynecologists into various professions has not been commensurate with their representation in the medical field as a whole in the UK. Women are well represented in general care / primary care, yet they are not represented in the medical and surgical fields, especially at the senior level.
The researchers wanted to find out if doctors were able to measure women’s representation accurately in different areas and positions, and whether these perceptions affected their plans to support programs to improve gender equality in the medical field.
The researchers looked at 425 UK-based consultants, GPs, specialist trainers / junior practitioners on their perceptions of doctors in the UK. medicine. About half (47%) of the respondents were women.
Respondents were recruited through social media; website of dedicated doctors; and through a list of services administered by 24 royal colleges and colleges, 214 trusted health services, a 46-member medical team and civil society organizations.
Respondents were asked to indicate the number (0-100%) of physicians at different levels, including those who were trained, and in different professions, were women.
To quantify the minimum number of participants – or more than the actual number, the researchers reduced their response to the actual number of women working in each area / role.
To measure support for efforts designed to improve gender equality in the UK medical profession, respondents were asked to indicate how much (dead) they agreed that these practices were necessary, fair, excessive / ‘over’ or put men in trouble. scale 1-7, where 1 corresponds to strong disagreement and 7 corresponds to strong agreement.
Examination of the answers showed that both men and women preferred the assessment of the number of female counselors and GPs.
They estimated the number of female counselors to be 43% (actual rate 37%) in medicine and 25% (actual percentage 14%) in surgery. Approximately the number of female consultants / GPs in collective work was 58% (actual figure 54%).
Estimates of the number of female trainees vary more than the specific ones, but estimates are still apparent when a regional study is limited to respondents who are themselves in that area of medicine.
Respondents underestimate the number of female GP trainers (63.5%) vs 69%) and above or below estimate the number of trained female physicians (54%) vs 53%).
But they estimate the number of surgeons (37.5%) vs 33%) and women medical graduates (60%) vs 55%).
Assessment women’s representation in medicine across regions and the role played has been associated with a reluctance to back up in an effort to promote gender equality, especially among men.
Among the women who responded, regardless of the estimated number of women in the medical profession, there were no statistical differences at the level of support for gender-based programs.
The gap between support for the gender equality program that estimated women’s representation was small, with male support less than women’s.
Yet among those who underestimated the representation of women by 10 percent, this gender gap increased by 150%, indicating a decline in support among male physicians. Women’s support has come to a standstill.
The researchers looked to see if this system was related to the notion that male doctors were better than female doctors.
Those who strongly agree with this ideology do not support gender issues, at all. But even after this has been considered, support for gender-based programs among men is still associated with lower rates and costs for women in medicine.
This is a observational study, and therefore, cannot establish a causative factor, adding that the areas / activities involved are incomplete, so the study may not translate to the entire UK medical profession, say the researchers .
But they wrote: “Men who go too far with the true nature found in women’s representation are at greater risk of ruining it.”
They added: “This indicates a negative outcome that may arise as women’s representation grows in a given field. It seems to have led some to err on the side of exaggeration and stereotype over real change, and subsequently, especially for men, erroneously consider this species. equality efforts in the field do not deserve support.
“This ultimately undermines efforts to promote gender equality, whether it be promoting women’s representation in areas where they are not yet represented or fighting gender-based issues without gender representation. . ”
Assessing and Representing Women in Medicine: a study of the statistics of doctors and their programs (un) to support gender equality policies, BMJ Open (2022). DOI: 10.1136 / bmjopen-2021-054769
British Medical Journal
hintDoctors are considering the development of gender equality in British medicine, found a study (2022, March 21) retrieved March 21, 2022 from https://medicalxpress.com/news/2022-03-doctors- tend-overestimate-gender-equality.html
This document is copyrighted. Apart from any genuine transaction for the purpose of personal analysis or investigation, any part may not be reproduced without our written permission. Content is provided for informational purposes only.
Doctors tend to overestimate gender equality progress in UK medicine, finds survey Source link Doctors tend to overestimate gender equality progress in UK medicine, finds survey