When it comes to buying Microsoft software, doing it through the company itself is always the most cost-effective option.
Fortunately, you don’t have to go that route and there are plenty of ways to save – especially if you take advantage of the prices offered at VIP-CDKDeals.
Now all the offers you see below are available when you enter the discount code RM30 during checkout. Retailers have Windows 11 keys on sale for just $24.30 while those looking for Windows 10 will see prices start at just $14.70. Make sure you enter the code to get the best price.
With that said, let’s dive in!
You might also like to check out:
You can follow us on X, or Instagram, subscribe to our YouTube channel and even like our Facebook page so you can stay updated with all the latest from Microsoft, Google, Apple, and the Web.
The telecommunications industry (with the help of the new Trump Supreme Court), has been drooling for months at the prospect that the Trump-stocked court will soon deliver a killing blow to the FCC’s net neutrality protections (read: the popular FCC rules designed to prevent. telecommunications monopolies from abusing market power to beat customers and competitors).
As predicted, this week, the Trumplican-heavy Sixth Circuit delivered, with a ruling that blocked Biden’s FCC plan to restore net neutrality rules. All of these decisions seem to be straight out of the telecom lobbyist’s playbook, with many bogus claims about how this basic regulation threatens the open web and constitutes a “burdensome regulatory regime”:
“Today we consider the latest FCC order, issued in 2024, which revives the FCC’s burdensome regulatory regime.”
To be clear, the FCC’s net neutrality rules are ridiculous by international standards. They have many loopholes for ISPs to stumble upon. They have never been consistently enforced by the FCC which is uncommon and arresting. And he sees great popularity among America’s bipartisan majority. Right out of the gate calling the rules “heavy-handed” informs.
As a refresher, the “net neutrality debate” is more than just “net neutrality.” It’s about whether we want consumer protection officials to protect broadband consumers from a monopolized and corrupt industry filled with unpopular predatory companies that routinely raise poor service standards, price gouging, and bad behavior.
The more specific legal debate here is whether ISPs should be classified as “information services” under Title II of the Communications Act, which would reduce the FCC’s authority over telecommunications. Or as “telecommunications services,” which would expand the FCC’s role in protecting consumers from fraud, improving 911 reliability, fighting consolidation, and encouraging cybersecurity standards.
But contrary to public and press pretenses, the telecommunications industry’s policy position in this regard is not consistent; giants like AT&T and Verizon have waffled on whether or not they support one classification or another depending on whether they are trying to dodge FTC fines for lying to customers or trying to gobble up billions in taxpayer subsidies. Repeat, because it’s important. The same telecom companies are very happy to have broadband classified as a telecom service when it means they get extra subsidies.
Real Purpose No Consumer Protection Oversight of Any US Company
It usually gets lost in the weeds of press and policy coverage, but “net neutrality” is a bit troubling.
The telcos (and the various think tanks, lawyers, lobbyists, and consultants paid to love them) not only oppose net neutrality, but indeed any federal broadband consumer protection. It doesn’t matter whether we’re talking about basic price transparency requirements or accurate broadband maps; the telecom industry is desperate to rip you off without pesky federal interference.
They are ready to get what they want, and more. As expected, the Sixth Circuit’s dismantling of net neutrality (and the FCC’s authority more generally) hinges heavily on the recent Trump Supreme Court Loper Bright decision, which has dealt with the last vestiges of regulatory independence:
“Today we consider the latest FCC order, issued in 2024, which revives the FCC’s heavy regulatory regime. According to the Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet Order, Broadband Internet Service Providers are again considered to offer “telecommunications services” under Title II and therefore must comply net neutrality principle. But unlike the past challenges the DC Circuit considered in Chevron, we cannot respect the FCC’s reading of the statute. Rather, our task is to determine the “best reading of the statute” in the first place.
The company claims that it wants to kill Chevron Deference (which provides regulators with subject matter expertise to create and interpret rules within the limits of Congressional law) because “regulators have run amok.” But the idea that the FCC (which struggled to stand up for AT&T and Comcast in the good old days) has “run amok” is definitely misinformation.
The truth is, with Congress in their back pockets and unable to reform, companies want to deliver the final killing blow to regulators who might get bright ideas about trying to rein in their power or punish them for fraud. This has been dressed up in the press as some sort of noble, good rebalancing institutions (I recommend Law Professor Blake Reid’s dissection of this kerfuffle).
The court did not go quite as far as can have used the recent Loper Bright decision to dismantle all of the FCC’s authority over every last aspect of telecommunications, but the goal here is not subtle: federal consumer protections over your broadband line are dead.
I’m not going to spend too much time dissecting the finer legalese here, because it’s all bullshit. The administration parrots the position of AT&T and Comcast lawyers, insisting on ignoring logic, precedent, and history, and it’s not subtle about it. The better argument, the better legal merits of this debate at this point is like trying to have a meaningful conversation with a damp walnut.
They want journalists and the public to treat this pseudo-legal, pseudo-logical circus with respect and seriousness. I will not. It is corrupt with a lazy coat of paint.
Lose Lose
If the Sixth Circuit doesn’t rule in favor of the big telcos, incoming FCC chairman Brendan Carr (R, AT&T) is poised to dismantle the rules. You may remember Brendan from the first Trump FCC dismantling of net neutrality, which involved creating DDOS attacks to eliminate public anger, and turning a blind eye to the industry using dead and fake people to fill the FCC comment section.
Brendan views consumer protection as a sinister government overreach, but the media and bullying tech companies do not. There is no real logic here. People and journalists should not get lost in the weeds: this is the power of corporations that use their influence on corrupt US courts and regulators to undermine them. entire corporate consumer protection authority, not just some piddly net neutrality rule.
This is not to say that net neutrality is not important. The big ISPs have long shown that they are willing to abuse market power. Ideally, you would need Congress to enact net neutrality legislation to end regulatory ping pong at the FCC, but if Congress does too damaged to functionwho is always a non starter. There are many people who like to make this point in the press (including AT&T). understand it is a non-starter.
The decision of the Sixth Circuit comes ironically (?) on the heels of the revelation that the telecommunications industry has just suffered one of the worst hacking disruptions in American history, thanks (in part) to broad and mindless deregulation and the corrupt refusal to hold telecommunications accountable for. lax security standards. Or pass even the most basic of modern privacy or cybersecurity protection.
The basic argument by telecoms, “free market” Libertarians, and many Republicans has long been that if you eliminate federal oversight of unscrupulous US telecommunications, magic and innovation are off the streets. That’s for sure never has been the case. Without considering removing federal corporate oversight of regional monopolies like Comcast and AT&T and these entities just doubled down on their worst behavior.
Mostly because the same people pushing for mindless deregulation also support AT&T and Comcast’s efforts to ensure there is no meaningful broadband competition.
As a result, the big telcos don’t innovate or compete. These are regional monopolies that effectively buy comfortable positions from corrupt state and federal bureaucrats, who work hard to ensure that there is no competition or serious government oversight. One hopes the end of the net neutrality battle directs attention to the real problem: the combined monopoly power.
The Sixth Circuit’s ruling isn’t all good news for big ISPs like Comcast and AT&T. Courts and legal precedent (for whatever that’s worth) have repeatedly stated that if the federal government were to override federal consumer protection authority, states would have the legal right to enforce their own net neutrality rules.
That said, while many states have net neutrality laws (such as California, Washington, Maine, and Oregon), many others do not. And among those exerciseI highly suspect that implementing net neutrality is not going to be a top priority given all the bottomless immigration, environment, labor, and life and death legal fights that are headed in the cash-strapped countries’ direction during Trump 2.0.
It’s important to understand this is more than just “net neutrality.” This is about corporate power using corruption to take the ax for coherent federal consumer protection finished– according to the pretensions of those who carry out such actions with due care and caution regarding the law.
And of course about far more than telecommunications; post Loper Bright every industry across America is busy making the same arguments about every worker, consumer, public safety, and environmental rules they don’t like, have a massive impact on every industry and privacy that touches every last part of life. The company has achieved (another) generational victory in dismantling consumer protection.
The net neutrality fight may be different and wonky, but if you think about the wider existential, legal, and operational chaos caused by this Trump 2.0 attack on the federal government it has been defeated or will be defeated either way. good for you (unless you’re a racist, idiotic billionaire who doesn’t care about mass suffering), you’re grossly misreading the situation.
Filed Under: 6th circuit , broadband , consumer protection , consumers , corruption , fcc , high speed internet , net neutrality , telecommunications , title ii
from the arrest-rage-for-‘insulting-the-police’ dept
It has long been recognized by federal courts that giving a one-finger salute to a law enforcement officer is not enough not crime, but speech is protected. It means that “birds” can’t be seen alone be the basis for a stop or arrest. And it certainly doesn’t justify the deployment of troops, especially of the “excess” variety.
If you’re not sure how the federal government feels about giving police the finger, documents fill the DOJ [PDF] briefly stated:
As Victim EB drove past defendant BENZA, defendant BENZA saw Victim EB extend his middle finger to defendant BENZA. The gesture of extending the middle finger in, called “flipping off” or “flip off,” a law enforcement officer is an activity protected by the First Amendment of the United States Constitution.
“Defendant BENZA” is Joseph Benza III, a deputy working for the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department (LASD). The LASD has been notorious for years, for incidents such as “gangs” of house deputies who celebrate the excessive deployment of troops with a new tattoo or the occasional disability of one of its members. It is also the subject of a DOJ investigation, thanks to the massive amount of internal corruption that extends to its illegal prison informant program.
“EB’s victim” is Emmett Brock, a transgender man who sidestepped Deputy Benza while driving an officer’s cruiser. The one-and-done led to a far more concentrated effort by the deputy to punish Brock for daring to disrespect people, but for a moment.
In response to seeing the gesture of Victim EB, accused BENZA leave the phone for the confirmed service and even started closely following Victim EB In pursuit of Victim EB, defendant BENZA drove through the neighborhood, at a certain point reaching a speed of over 50 miles per hour. Defendant BENZA followed Victim EB for approximately 1.8 miles without attempting to stop or pull Victim EB over.
While defendant BENZA was chasing Victim EB, defendant BENZA called Deputy A. During the call, defendant BENZA told Deputy A that someone was threatening him and that defendant BENZA was going to conduct a traffic stop on the person. Because defendant BENZA intended to use violence against Victim EB, defendant BENZA further asked Deputy A to start driving to defendant BENZA’s location.
Correct: Deputy Benza did not respond to a domestic violence call with the sole purpose of intentionally causing physical harm to someone who had abused him. Benza never officially pulled Brock. Instead, he waited until Brock had parked in front of the store before pulling up behind Brock and turning on his lights.
Which causes this:
Defendant BENZA approached Victim EB, who got out of Victim EB’s car. Defendant BENZA told Victim EB that defendant BENZA had stopped Victim EB Victim EB denied that defendant BENZA had stopped Victim EB.
Without giving Victim EB an order, defendant BENZA grabbed Victim EB Victim EB pulled away from defendant BENZA and said, “Don’t touch me.” Accused BENZA then pushed Victim EB to the ground. After Victim EB was on the ground, defendant BENZA mounted Victim EB, punched Victim EB several times in the head and face, and slammed Victim EB’s face into the sidewalk. The EB victim repeatedly screamed for help and yelled, “You’re going to kill me!”; “I can’t breathe!”; and “Please stop!”
[Personal note: I have experienced this same thing, minus the beating. I had a cop trail me for more than a mile and when I stopped at a convenience store, he claimed he had pulled me over. I called bullshit and more cops arrived, shined their flashlights into the cab of my truck and claimed someone had reported my “exhibition” driving nearly 10 miles away from the point I was “pulled over.” I again called bullshit and gradually the officers all wandered away to apparently find someone more easily exploitable to exploit. That I was white definitely altered the contours of the stop. It could have been worse. Sure, this is just anecdata, but it’s something cops do everywhere they think they can get away with it.]
All this was captured by the store’s camera, which is the only recording taken. Nothing was captured by the deputy’s dash cam. In addition, Deputy Benza and his colleagues (although none of the unnamed deputies were criminally charged) created a narrative that hides the fact that this “stop” was initiated only for revenge, deleted text messages between those involved. officials who showed another, and buried the fact that Benza searched the victim’s phone to make sure the victim’s device did not contain a recording of this stop.
Meanwhile, Brock suffers more pain than physical harm from the fake “stop”. This is from the Los Angeles Times report on the latest developments in this case that have been going on since it was first reported by Brock.
In the report, Benza said that Brock “was going to throw a punch,” so he grabbed his arm and hit him first, hitting him repeatedly. During the struggle, the deputy’s report states, Brock “tried to rip the skin off my hand” by repeatedly biting him.
But the paramedic report from the scene did not mention any bite marks. And when Benza went to the hospital later, the doctor’s assistant wrote that “there are no bite marks now.”
Still, Brock was taken to the Norwalk sheriff’s station and booked on three felonies and one misdemeanor. He suffered a concussion, along with scratches and bruises.
Brock’s family rescued him that evening. He lost his job four days after state authorities notified the school of pending charges, ie dropped a few weeks after The Times the first video published of the incident.
Fortunately, this attack was caught on tape. Otherwise, the DOJ may be forced to label the investigation inconclusive. But since then – and there are many other criminal charges the DOJ could choose to bring against the deputy – Benza has pleaded guilty to excessive force.
Nearly two years after he was caught on camera beating a transgender man in a 7-Eleven parking lot, a Los Angeles County sheriff’s deputy has agreed to plead guilty in federal court to violating his civil rights for using excessive force, prosecutors said Wednesday.
[…]
In a plea agreement filed the same day, Benza said he would plead guilty to a single felony charge, which carries a maximum sentence of 10 years in federal prison.
That means Benza will only pay the price for a single criminal charge, rather than several illegal acts detailed in the DOJ’s charging document. Whether or not he will spend time in prison remains to be seen. However, for now, Vice Benza is off the job and will be in jail, but it may be a little. For his former employer, it’s no better than usual: a welcome home for repeat offenders.
Previously, an internal investigation by the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department cleared the deputy of the wrongdoing. This week, the department said in a statement that its previous determination was based on statements and reports provided at the time.
That bastard. This is the LASD showing that in regards to the internal investigation, the officer said… there is none. It will not look for anything to contradict the officer’s sworn statement, even if there is a record of the alleged act. After all, there probably isn’t a single store in the Los Angeles area that isn’t crawling with CCTV cameras. All it will take is one request to destroy the deputy regent’s nonsense statement. However, LASD couldn’t be bothered to revisit this case until then next The LA Times posted the footage. It’s just painful.
Filed under: emmett brock, excessive force, joseph benza, lasd, dept. los angeles sheriff, police misconduct
Apple is kicking off the new year with a fun limited-edition pair of AirPods, but you might find yourself in trouble. As spotted by MacRumors on Friday, Apple is selling the Snake 4 Special Edition AirPods 4 with Active Noise Cancellation in celebration of the Chinese New Year (or Spring Festival) on January 29, 2025.
Currently, the AirPods 4 theme is only available in China, Hong Kong, Taiwan, and Singapore, so you can’t buy them directly from Apple anywhere in North America or Europe.
In the area where these AirPods are available, they cost the same as the standard model. They also offer all the same features – the only difference is the snake engraving on the AirPods 4 wireless charging case (and the red snake on the packaging).
Plus, these are the same AirPods 4 that were awarded 4.5 stars in last year’s review. As I said at the time, there’s a lot of competition in this price range when it comes to wireless headphones, but the AirPods 4 are “a worthwhile upgrade over the base AirPods 4, considering the addition of wireless charging and ANC.”
Tech. Entertainment. science. your inbox.
Sign up for the most interesting tech & entertainment news.
By registering, I agree to the Terms of Use and have reviewed the Privacy Notice.
MacRumors explains that releasing special edition AirPods is a tradition for Apple. The company has previously released AirPods to celebrate the Year of the Dragon, the Year of the Ox, the Year of the Tiger, and the Year of the Rabbit, but all of them are AirPods Pro.
Apple’s Year of the Snake AirPods 4 are now on sale and start shipping on January 8.
For the past few years, I’ve been using Cronometer as my nutrition app. It’s pretty good for tracking food, exercise, and more. I appreciate that it has very detailed nutritional data, and even if it is not, I can upload the nutrition label just a quick photo on my phone. It’s a nice app.
So I was very surprised last month to receive an email from a company saying that they no longer have a contract with their former data provider, a company called Trustwell, and because of that, the company has to delete previously recorded data from past meals that I have entered.
We are writing to let you know that our former food data provider, Trustwell (Formerly ESHA), requires us to remove food from our database. We believe his position is inappropriate and in violation of US law. However, we are in the process of removing Trustwell food from our database.
Such deletion will occur no later than February 15, 2025, and may be required to occur earlier based on Trustwell’s actions.
It then informs me that I need to delete data from two meals I have entered, both of them from last April. The company recommends: “If this old data is important to you, we recommend finding the item in your diary, and replacing it with an alternative from the database before removing it.”
It doesn’t matter much to me anymore since I don’t really care what I used back in April, but the whole thing seems preposterous. There are no intellectual property rights in nutrition data. In light of the Supreme Court’s ruling in Feist, I don’t see how anyone can claim copyright in that data. In Feist, it is about phone numbers in the phone book, purely factual data (in this case, phone numbers) cannot be subject to copyright, even if someone collects them in a single database. The same principle applies to nutritional data – these are hard-to-get facts, not creative expressions.
It is possible, as some have suggested to me at Bluesky, that there is a contractual agreement between Cronometer and ESHA to delete any data once the contract ends. If such consent exists, it should be limited to the database itself, not the person recording the data into a private journal. Because it’s not a “database” that’s copied into people’s tracking journals, it’s just factual data about certain foods. In addition, the user is not bound by any terms contained in Cronometer’s contract with others.
However, after digging into this story, some more details emerged, including ESHA suing Cronometer in September over this. The lawsuit alleges that the agreement between the two companies was that Cronometer would only use ESHA data for “its own internal analysis” and not make the data into a product. Chronometer’s answer to the lawsuit says it’s all nonsense. Note that the company immediately helped Cronometer implement the database into publicly available software, that the two companies are in regular contact about it, that ESHA employees told Cronometer how excited they were to review the app, and how ESHA even asked Cronometer if they could release it press about integration.
Even more to say:
The ESHA co-founder then downloaded a publicly available copy of Cronometer software and praise Cronometer for using the ESHA database in the software, thanks Cronometer for “playing by the rules.”
Either way, it’s another unfortunate example of the world we live in where digital services mean everything you care about can be taken away from you.
The reality is that this seems to be another thing that private equity is destroying. The email states that Cronometer had a previous deal with ESHA, which is now Trustwell. It appears that the new name is the result of a merger between ESHA and FoodLogiq, which was carried out with a combination of investment from private equity firm The Riverside Company. It seems entirely possible that after the merger, Trustwell has made it more difficult/expensive for an app like Cronometer to use its nutrition data, and now either demands more cash or removes the food already logged in from the user.
Indeed, Cronometer said in a legal filing that the private equity thugs who put together Trustwell really just wanted to break their deal with Cronometer so they could build a competing app:
What actually underlies this lawsuit is not a “secret” “scheme” by Cronometer, who use the database is always open and publicly recognized by ESHA. However, this lawsuit is part of a scheme designed by Trustwell and its investors to create a monopoly for one other product: Food Processor®, their diet tracking app competing with Cronometer products. This claim is supported by private infusion equity money that bought ESHA and formed Trustwell. That is a private equity investor seeks to monetize investments by illegally supporting Food Processor® market through the pursuit of baseless litigations against small companies like Cronometer to scare them out of the market with the threat of substantial legal expenditure.
Once again, this is why we can’t have nice things.
I’ve been looking for a projector on and off for a few years. I’m not really committed, but I’m still tempted. I don’t want anything fancy but rather a tool that will do well in a dark-enough environment, maybe something I can easily do from one place to another. The projector will never be the center of my streaming world, just an option.
With that in mind, I’m excited to see LG’s “breakthrough” PF600U device launched ahead of CES 2025. The product name alone won’t do this device justice, but it’s clear now that we’re talking about a floor lamp. which is also a projector and three are Bluetooth speakers.
LG’s light projector may have two projects aplenty, but I still think it’s an interesting concept, at least in theory.
LG said in a press release that the PF600U is a CES Innovation Award winner.
Tech. Entertainment. science. your inbox.
Sign up for the most interesting tech & entertainment news.
By registering, I agree to the Terms of Use and have reviewed the Privacy Notice.
The device looks like a floor lamp, using LED lights to illuminate the room. LG also mentions mood lighting, saying that you can adjust it to the ambiance of the room and the user’s preferences. The lamp supports nine colors and five levels of brightness.
Tilt the lamp and turn it into a projector. Image source: LG
Regarding the projector’s capabilities, the LG lamp supports Full HD (1920 x 1080) projection, a brightness of 300 ANSI lumens, and OTT streaming through LG’s webOS system. The lamp head can turn 110 degrees, and the projector supports automatic screen adjustment feature.
Finally, the LG light projector can also be used as a Bluetooth stereo speaker.
Unfortunately, LG did not provide a price and release date. I will also say that I don’t have high expectations for a projector that can also be used as a lamp. But the affordable price point could be just what my home gym needs: a bigger screen to keep track of training sessions.
The lamp will project an image that is 30 by 120 inches in size.
Projector LG CineBeam S. Image source: LG
LG also announced a more advanced projector in the same press release. The CineBeam S is a compact 4K UST short-throw projector that might be better suited for Netflix streaming duties.
The device supports 4K resolution, 500 ANSI lumens brightness, and coverage of 154 percent of the DCI-P3 color spectrum. More importantly, the CineBeam S only needs a few inches of space to project images that can be anywhere between 40 inches and 100 inches large.
CineBeam S measures only 160 x 160 x 110mm and weighs 2.5kg (5.51 pounds).
Like LG’s light projectors, the CineBeam S doesn’t have a price or a release date yet.
Start your language learning journey with a lifetime subscription to Rosetta Stone for all languages. Trusted by top organizations like NASA, Calvin Klein, and TripAdvisor, Rosetta Stone has been the go-to language learning software for the past 27 years. With immersive and intuitive training methods, you can be reading, writing, and speaking a new language with confidence in no time. On sale for $180.
Note: Techdirt Deals Store is powered and curated by StackCommerce. A portion of all sales from Techdirt Deals help support Techdirt. Products displayed do not reflect endorsement by our editorial team.
from the not-actually-wanting-to-defuse-the-entire-ACAB-thing dept
What will surprise no one, the Arizona prosecutor decided that no police should be punished for cooperating with a different Arizona prosecutor to portray the violent anti-police protesters as gang members with the sole purpose of getting a sentence enhancement.
Like millions across the country, residents of Phoenix, Arizona took to the streets to protest police brutality and advocate for increased police accountability. Obviously, some of the police were sympathetic to the protest.
But Phoenix police officers (he is the subject of a recent DOJ investigation) decided it was not enough to throw some people behind bars in “insulting the police” charges that often accompany anti-police protests. They went one step further, colluding with the Maricopa County attorney’s office to treat legitimate protests as acts of gang violence. The evidence that the police and the prosecutor offered to the court was ludicrous. He insisted on using the word “ACAB” (All Police Bastards) as nothing more than a few gang tags. Using this and similar statements of doubt, Phoenix PD and prosecutors hope to end at least some people in prison with sentence enhancements – The sort of thing that turns misdemeanors into serious felonies and can add up to a decade to the sentence prison
This included lying to the jury members about the definition of ACAB for the sole purpose of producing (false) gang charges to disperse the arrested protesters.
Q: And do you find that the ACAB follows the same philosophy, like the Bloods and the Crips?
A: Yes.
Q: And could it even be the same philosophy as the Hell’s Angels?
A: Very similar, yes.
Q: And why the same?
A: I think because of the tattoos, the intimidation factor, how they direct violent behavior that is very similar to the Hells Angel organization where they actually organize violent behavior, and then do it in an organized way. It’s not random with the Hells Angels.
Q: And you find what this ACAB group is doing is organizing to create violence?
A: Yes.
This would be funny if it wasn’t actually scary. Cops lied to jurors, with the blessing of Maricopa County prosecutors, in hopes of taking away years of people’s freedom.
An investigation by a local news station (ABC15) revealed all of this, exposing the police and prosecutors involved in this allegation, including April Sponsel, who is married to a state trooper. More investigations should follow, but Arizona law enforcement agencies have universally refused to dig into this misconduct by Phoenix PD and Maricopa County officials. At only investigations conducted by the government are handled by people who no longer work any branch of government, as ABC15 reports.
A criminal investigation was launched against retired FBI agent James Egelston as several other Arizona law enforcement agencies refused to investigate the scandal. The investigation of Egelston was submitted to the Pinal County Prosecutor’s Office due to Maricopa County’s role in defrauding the protesters.
The end result is nothing. Everyone involved will face zero consequences for their actions because of Pinal County prosecutors parallel not interested in holding the police and prosecutors accountable.
[I]declination letter, Pinal County Attorney Kent Volkmer wrote the incident review board office which will not bring the case.
“It is the Board’s opinion that none of the (individuals) committed acts that warrant criminal prosecution,” according to the letter.
Tampering, perjury, filing false reports…nothing deserves even the slightest punishment. And even with the US DOJ coming to the same conclusion about false accusations and perjury. Maricopa County has tacitly agreed to be targeted by this nonsense and offered a $6 million settlement to the arrested protesters. The city of Phoenix, however, still thinks it’s a wise use of public funds to continue fighting the protesters’ lawsuits, signaling to crooked police that it will do whatever it takes to stop them. acknowledge guilt, let alone be punished.
Since no one in power wants to make it more difficult for officers and prosecutors to forget (recent) historical mistakes, the citizens of the city and district will surely repeat the performance of the alleged civil servant.
Filed under: 1st amendment, acab, arizona, black lives matter, gang database, pd phoenix, police brutality, police violence
Apple is expected to release AirPods Pro 3 in 2025. Three years after the first iteration of AirPods Pro 2 with Lightning port was launched, Cupertino is expected to add the best earbuds. Despite the fact that last year’s AirPods Max update was disappointing, we expect Apple’s next-generation AirPods Pro to be a bigger update thanks to some new features and upgrades.
This article covers eight rumored features that should make the AirPods Pro 3 an instant hit, and potentially the best earbuds on the planet.
Better ANC: Apple has offered an amazing ANC. With advanced algorithms, the company also offers best-in-class Transparency and Adaptive modes. For the third-generation AirPods Pro, Apple is expected to greatly improve ANC, and may build on the technology available for AirPods 4, which offers ANC even without ear tips.
Better hearing aid capabilities: AirPods Pro 2 are the first earbuds to offer hearing aid capabilities. It is certain that Apple will continue to improve this feature with the upcoming version of the earbuds pro. In addition, there is another reason why the capabilities of hearing aids will improve with the next generation.
Tech. Entertainment. science. your inbox.
Sign up for the most interesting tech & entertainment news.
By registering, I agree to the Terms of Use and have reviewed the Privacy Notice.
H3 chip: Apple does a great job with audio chips. All the way from the W1 chip and magical features, the company has walked a long way to bring the H2 processor. Until now, Apple continues to add more features to the AirPods Pro 2. It is certain that Cupertino will continue to improve the audio quality and connectivity between the AirPods and the iPhone while delivering new features, such as better ANC, better hearing aid capabilities, and more -apart.
Heart rate measurement: according to BloombergMark Gurman, one of the top features of the AirPods Pro 3 is probably the heart rate measurement. At the time, the reporter said that the measurements of the Apple Watch were more accurate than the AirPods prototype, but not by much. This can be perfect for those who don’t like wearing smartwatches all the time.
Body temperature: Finally, Apple has also been working on a body temperature sensor for the upcoming AirPods. The company could add a camera to help measure body temperature, which could be more accurate than the sensors that come with the Apple Watch.
Other tidbits for the upcoming AirPods Pro 3 may include better battery life, a thinner case (if we consider the AirPods 4), stronger water and dust resistance, and more.
Wrap it up
These are the features you can most expect in the upcoming AirPods Pro 3. BGR will let you know as we learn more about this device.
Making sure you have the right Wi-Fi network at home can make all the difference whether you’re streaming content to your TV or playing games, and Wi-Fi 7 technology is the latest technology the networking world has to offer. It’s fast and stable, and now you can upgrade your home to Wi-Fi 7 all while saving $80.
This TP-Link BE9300 router normally retails for almost $300, but a limited-time deal means you can only pay $219.99. This is a deal that won’t last long, but you don’t need to do anything special to take advantage of it. That means no on-screen coupons or discount codes are needed here, but you need to make sure to act quickly; otherwise, you risk missing out.
This router supports six-stream Wi-Fi 7 with a maximum throughput of 9.2Gbps. There are also six antennas to ensure home coverage of up to 2,000 square feet, and the router is also designed to work with mesh systems if that’s the route you want to go.
High-speed connection users will enjoy 2.5 gigabit WAN ports, while there are also four LAN ports of the same speed as well. That means this router is ready for future devices that offer fast wired connections as well as the latest in wireless connectivity, all at a price that saves $80 for a limited time only.
Buy: TP-Link BE9300: $219.99 | Original price: $300
You might also like to check out:
You can follow us on X, or Instagram, subscribe to our YouTube channel and even like our Facebook page so you can stay updated with all the latest from Microsoft, Google, Apple, and the Web.
