Local

California’s under-21 gun sales ban unconstitutional

The U.S. Court of Appeals ruled Wednesday that California’s ban on selling semi-automatic weapons to adults under the age of 21 is unconstitutional. Previous coverage of the video game above Francisco Appeals said Wednesday that the law violates Amendment 2 right to bear arms, and a San Diego judge should have blocked what he called a “near-total ban on semi-automatic central firearms” for young adults. “America would not exist without the heroism of the young adults who fought and died in our revolutionary army,” wrote Judge Ryan Nelson. “Today we reaffirm that our Constitution continues to protect the right that allowed their sacrifice: the right of young adults to bear and bear arms. prevent the state from requiring hunting licenses for the purchase of rifles or shotguns from adults under the age of 21 who are not serving in the military or law enforcement. Arms sales to people under the age of 21 were already banned when the hunting permit requirement was approved in 2018 after some of the nation’s worst mass shootings were committed by young adults using rifles, including the Valentine’s Valentine’s Murder at St. in Parkland, Florida. The court ruled the hunt. The request for a permit made sense in order to increase public safety through the “reasonable control of firearms”. In 2019, the state passed an additional law banning the sale of semi-automatic firearms to people under the age of 21. There were exceptions for police or military personnel but not for those with hunting licenses Matthew Jones, then 20 years old from Santee in San Diego County, was the main plaintiff in the case. He said he wanted a weapon for self-defense and other legal purposes, but did not want a hunting license. His lawsuit, which was filed before the semi-automatic weapons ban, was amended to challenge this law and the Hunting Permit Requirement. The lawsuit alleges that the state had “reduced” the already unenforceable and irrelevant “exemption” of a hunting license – the only exception still possible for an ordinary, law-abiding young adult who does not want to pursue a very dangerous career in law enforcement or in the army – by banning an entire category of firearms. ” The two judges who ruled in the majority were part of the wave of presidential candidates approved by the Conservatives in the famous liberal court. A dispute was written by the US District Court Judge Sidney Stein, who was appointed to the commission by the Southern District of New York. Stein was nominated in lower court by President Bill Clinton. Democrat Sen. Anthony Portino of La Cañada Flintridge, who wrote both laws, said he was disappointed the lift was lifted, but was pleased that the hunting permit requirement survived. “I remain committed to keeping deadly weapons out of the wrong hands,” Portantino said. “Student safety on our campuses is something we all need to support, and rational gun control is part of that solution.” Attorney General Rob Bonta’s office said it was reviewing the decision. common sense weapons laws “.

The U.S. Court of Appeals ruled Wednesday that that of California ban on the sale of semi-automatic weapons for adults under 21 is unconstitutional.

  • Previous coverage in the above video player.


In a 2-1 ruling, a San Francisco-based 9th Circuit Court of Appeals panel ruled Wednesday that the law violates the 2nd Amendment right to bear arms, and a San Diego judge should have blocked what he called “almost complete ban on semi-automatic central rifles “for young adults. “America would not exist without the heroism of the young adults who fought and died in our revolutionary army,” wrote Judge Ryan Nelson. “Today we affirm that our Constitution continues to protect the right that allowed their sacrifice: the right of young adults to bear and bear arms.”

The Firearms Policy Coalition, which prosecuted the case, said the decision leaves optimists that age-related gun bans will be overturned in other courts.

However, the decision was not a complete victory for the defenders of arms rights.

They had tried to prevent the state from requiring hunting licenses for the purchase of rifles or shotguns from adults under the age of 21 who are not in the military or law enforcement.

Arms sales to people under the age of 21 were already banned when the hunting license requirement was approved in 2018, after some of the worst mass shootings in the country were committed by young adults using rifles, including the Valentine’s Valentine’s Murder Douglas in Parkland, Florida.

The court ruled that the requirement for a hunting license was reasonable in order to increase public safety through “reasonable control of firearms”.

In 2019, the state passed an additional law banning the sale of semi-automatic central fire rifles to people under the age of 21. There were exceptions for police or military soldiers but not for those with hunting licenses.

Matthew Jones, then 20 years old from Santee in San Diego County, was the main plaintiff in the case. He said he wanted a weapon for self-defense and other legal purposes, but did not want to get a hunting license.

His lawsuit, which was filed before the juvenile semi-automatic weapons ban, was amended to challenge that law and the requirement of a hunting license.

The lawsuit alleges that the state had “reduced” the already unenforceable and irrelevant “exemption” of a hunting license – the only exception still possible for an ordinary, law-abiding young adult who does not wish to pursue a highly risky career in law enforcement or army – by banning an entire category of firearms “.

The two judges who ruled in the majority were part of President Donald Trump’s wave of Conservative-approved candidates in the famous Liberal court.

Dispute was written by U.S. District Court Judge Sidney Stein, who was appointed to the commission by the Southern District of New York. Stein was nominated in lower court by President Bill Clinton.

Democrat Sen. Anthony Portantino of La Cañada Flintridge, who wrote both laws, said he was disappointed the lift was lifted, but was pleased that the hunting permit requirement survived.

“I remain committed to keeping deadly weapons out of the wrong hands,” Portantino said. “Student safety on our campuses is something we all need to unite on, and rational gun control is part of that solution.”

Attorney General Rob Boda’s office said it was reviewing the decision. In a statement, a spokesman said he was committed to “defending California common law laws.”

California’s under-21 gun sales ban unconstitutional Source link California’s under-21 gun sales ban unconstitutional

Related Articles

Back to top button