The man at the gun show picked up a 2.2-pound rifle and pulled back the stock in a “coveted” sound, presenting it to the host of the YouTube segment.
“When we went out to make firearms for kids in AR-looking packaging, we were pretty sure we should have a ‘wow factor’ in safety,” said Eric Schmid, owner of Wee 1 Tactical. video Uploaded in January.
What the Wee 1 Tactical from Utah produced was a smaller model of the AR-15, called the JR-15. Schmid was in Las Vegas in January to promote the smaller arms, which The company is committed Will look and feel “just like Mom and Dad’s gun.”
He immediately demonstrated a safety pin designed to keep the trigger of the weapon locked. He and the host noted that this would probably prevent young children from using firearms without their parents’ presence.
“It takes a lot of tension to be able to get it out,” host Bart Kendrick said.
“Your 12-year-olds are going to open it up really fast,” Schmid replied.
A bill passed from the assembly on Thursday night will make the marketing of weapons to children and those who are not allowed to hold them under civil liability law. AB 1594 Will allow lawsuits against arms manufacturers based on their marketing, one of the few exemptions to a federal ban on such lawsuits. The bill is now in the hands of the Senate.
Brought in by the San Francisco Democrat Much thingThe bill is an attempt to ensure arms manufacturers will not be able to oppose state-of-the-art lawsuits in the state court – an argument that Smith & Wesson raised in court in San Diego last year.
The proposal is similar to a bill passed last year in New York – one that survived a A legal challenge on the part of proponents of gun rights In federal court on Wednesday.
“Unfortunately, not a day goes by until there is another tragic mass shooting,” Ting said. “We have guns in the hands of the wrong people and we have an industry that does not take responsibility for empowering murderers in our community.”
The bill claims that some arms manufacturers market and sell “new and increasingly dangerous products”, from Ghost guns To Hit stocks, Which gives them an unfair business advantage over “more responsible competitors”. If passed, the bill would allow the Department of Justice, district attorneys, city attorneys and the public to sue over these methods.
Among the methods detailed in the bill are:
- Manufacturers who produce rifles with “most suitable for assault purposes” and not for hunting or self-defense.
- Pistols designed, sold, or marketed in a way that “predictably” promotes them to become illegal weapons, such as turning a semi-automatic weapon into a fully automatic weapon.
- Pistols designed, sold or marketed to children or people who are prohibited by law from possessing firearms.
The bill is part of a larger wave of more than a dozen gun control laws proposed by Democrats in California before today’s deadline to pass bills from their hometown.
As news traveled around the country on Tuesday of Mass shooting at an elementary school in Texas Which left at least 22 dead – inclusive 19 children, two teachers And the 18-year-old California lawmaker has promoted a package of arms control bills, including one sponsored by Gov. Newus. Participates in the structure of the abortion ban in Texas Crack the illegal weapons.
Prominent timing highlighted a common challenge facing California, Texas and other states: reducing gun deaths, which Have risen dramatically across the country against the backdrop of the plague.
But it also served as a launching point for Newsom – A relentless critic of Texas – and other Democratic officials criticize Republicans for refusing to support stricter restrictions on guns.
- Newsom tweeted: “Another shooting. And the GOP will not do anything about it. Who the hell are we if we can not keep our children safe. It is preventable. Our inaction is a choice.”
- Attorney General Rob Bonte tweeted: “These are our children. Our babies. It’s sickening. And I’m angry. The GOP continues to prioritize the gun lobby over our children’s lives.”
Democratic lawmakers summoned the shooting in Texas on several occasions during a Senate marathon sitting on Tuesday: “One more death from one shot is too much,” said state Senator Anthony Fortentino of Glendale, calling for support for a Texas-inspired abortion bill that would give California private the right Sue manufacturers, sellers and distributors of illegal assault weapons, ghost guns and certain other weapons And collect at least $ 10,000 civilian compensation for each weapon.
- The proposal passed a vote close to the party line: Democratic State Sen. Melissa Hortado Messenger voted with Republicans in opposition.
Following last week Extraction of more than 200 banknotes B A highly secretive and opaque processThe Assembly and the Senate are in a hurry to pass hundreds of bills before them Friday due date For proposals to evacuate the house in which they were presented.
Here’s a look at Other weapon suggestions Progress:
On Wednesday, one day after a person killed at least 21 people with AR-15 Shooting in an elementary school in Texas, Newsom noticed several weapons marketing tactics at a press conference that raised support for AB 1594 and other weapons control measures.
“You have people who manufacture and market AR-15 for babies. For babies,” Newsom said. “And their logo is a pacifier with the baby AR-15. These are extremes. They need to be called.”
Newsum seemed to be talking about the logo of the JR-15 and the Wee 1 Tactical, which is two skulls with a target in one eye and sucked in every mouth. One skull has a mohawk and the other has braids.
Lawsuits against arms manufacturers are prohibited under the Law on the Protection of the Legal Trade in Arms, a 2005 law that the NRA said at the time was “the most significant deployment of legislation supporting arms in twenty years.”
Federal law allowed Six exceptions In which lawsuits against arms manufacturers are allowed. One is for manufacturers who violate state or federal laws governing the marketing or sale of guns.
The marketing exception to the law allowed parents of children killed in the Sandy Hawk Elementary School massacre in 2012 to successfully sue Remington Arms last year. A state lawsuit in San Diego after a 2019 shooting was allowed to continue last year on the same basis.
Survivors of a shooting in a San Diego area synagogue claimed that Smith & Wesson used marketing “which attracted impulsive youths with military complexes who were particularly likely to be drawn to the unique capability of AR-15-style weapons.”
Smith & Wesson responded that federal law protects them from such lawsuits, but a San Diego County Supreme Court judge disagreed, noting the marketing exception.
Michael Schwartz, executive director of the San Diego District, said the bill and others raised by Democrats pose a threat to gun ownership across California.
“If implemented and fully implemented, it’s a huge threat to gun rights,” Schwartz said. “There is no way to prevent anyone from using the product illegally. But you would not sue Ford for someone who drank and drove.”
When it comes to the JR-15, highlighted by Newsom, Schwartz said marketing is still directed at people who can purchase the guns, the parents. And he says previous laws around regulating the marketing of age-restricted products like tobacco do not apply to guns.
“I do not know what the perceived fear is, but I am not afraid that children will be addicted to AR-15,” Schwartz said. “It’s the most popular long pistol in the United States because it works in all sorts of situations.”
California Assembly OKs Bill to Allow Lawsuits for Marketing Guns to Kids Source link California Assembly OKs Bill to Allow Lawsuits for Marketing Guns to Kids