Governor Gavin Christopher has completed three rounds of an annual ritual to decide what to do in California by protesting or disagreeing with hundreds of bills sent by the state legislature.
In the first year, he used a routine to show the difference from his predecessor. Sign dozens of bills rejected by Jerry Brown — But Brown rejected a higher percentage of invoices than he normally did.
And this year, his third Newsome used a veto pen about half of his first year as governor and said “no” to about 8% of the 836 invoices that hit his desk. ..
By doing so, New Sam was mainly proven Traditional governance philosophies used veto power to block bills that exceeded the state’s budget, clash with work already underway in the administration, and repeat ideas he had already denied. In essence, Newsome’s veto in 2021 proved more about what he had in common with his predecessor than how unique he was.
“He is similar to other governors and has some consistent themes and foundations for the governor to reject legislation,” said Chris Micheli, a lobbyist and lawyer who teaches law school courses on the legislative process. increase.
“His first year in office was very different.”
Christopher held a public celebration event with lawmakers to sign the bill, but announced the veto by stating the veto at the end of the press release. Very many of them flew under the radar. I had to read his veto message to get an explanation or justification for why he didn’t believe the proposal should be law in California. In several bills, he cited multiple reasons.
Some of the key themes that emerged from this year’s Newsome’s 66 vetos are:
It’s not on budget
The progress of some of the bills that Newsome defended in the past nevertheless lowered his thumb. Why?He claimed in many veto messages, so the proposal would cost money, even though the state hasn’t budgeted. Unprecedented plunge in state revenue and federal aid..
that is What New Sam said By submitting a bill to increase the amount of salary a worker can receive While taking paid family vacation -He is Signed two extensions of Family vacation program In the last few years. A spokesman for Newsome’s finance department told Cal Matters that the bill would have raised costs for both employees and the state, including millions of computer upgrades and public assistance.
Newsome also had a cost discussion Refuse to significantly expand university financial assistance.. Only a few months ago, he signed a budget that included an additional $ 3.3 billion for college. This includes a $ 1.5 billion increase for student grants and work study opportunities. “Expanding access to financial assistance was a priority for my administration,” he said. Written with his veto.. But he told lawmakers that major changes to the system need to be considered as part of the normal budgeting process.
I already told you’no’
As he is more skilled as governor, a new theme appears in Newsome’s veto: calling for repetition.
“As stated in the veto message on a similar law in 2019.” New Sam wrote In submitting a bill prohibiting payments to petition circulators for each signature collected, “Thank you for the intent of this bill to encourage grassroots support for initiatives, referendums, and the recall process.”
However, he said changing the way workers are paid to collect signatures could make the process more expensive, and wealthy profits could have an even greater impact on the initiative process. rice field.
Similarly He refused Laws that allow state government supervisors to resolve disputes through binding arbitration add costs and can create conflicts with existing procedures, he said.
Former Governor Brown, who I saw over and over again as the longest-serving governor in California, also had a habit of using it. His refusal message To emphasize the rationale behind his previous veto.
Overwhelming support is not guaranteed
Newsome blocked many bills that weren’t controversial as he passed Congress, and surprised the veto after the proposal went on without drama for months.
For example, attempts to crack down on the use of “bots” to scoop up camp reservations in state parks have swept bipartisan support and passed the state legislature, with no formal opposition.But Newsome Said no bill needed The state has added security measures to its camp booking website.
Measures requiring police officers to be trained in “interpersonal communication skills and ethical science-based interviews” also passed through the Capitol without a single “opposition” vote. Newsam said he liked the idea but didn’t want to spend the mandatory costs on the police station.of Rejection of billHe instructed the police training committee to create a training course and said it was up to the department to decide whether police officers would take it.
Patio umbrellas look little like a controversial subject. Lawmakers overwhelmingly agreed that state law should allow alcohol manufacturers to distribute promotional patio umbrellas to places where they sell alcohol. But Newsome — the owner of Plumpjack’s wine and hospitality business and often talks about launching a small wine shop as a young entrepreneur — Refused legislation“We will increase the number of alcohol signs and advertisements in public areas, which will be detrimental to small alcohol makers who cannot compete with the marketing budgets of multi-billion dollar companies,” he said.
Things to keep in mind when evaluating some new ideas
Newsam just said no about the two bills intended to address the tragedy of drug addiction.
A bill allowing Yolo County to create a rehabilitation program for drug addicts who have committed certain crimes Bipartisan support From the legislators of both houses Newsome rejected it He said it could lead to “compulsory treatment” and prevent “long-term recovery from participants’ substance use disorders.” Many progressive criminal justice reform groups opposed the bill. This includes the Drug Policy Alliance, in which board member George Soros donated $ 1 million. Help Newsome fight last month’s recall..
At the same time, Newsome rejection Another bill backed by the drug policy alliance, measures to pay people recovering from drug addiction Incentive to stay calm.. He wrote that the state is about to launch a similar pilot project. We would like to evaluate the results before agreeing to the extension. The bill cleared Congress with overwhelming bipartisan support, but was opposed by Newsome’s finance department.
Similarly, he blocked two proposals aimed at changing the rules of pedestrian and cyclist roads. One would have made J-Walk non-criminal and the other would have passed the stop sign on the bike.
Proponents of the J-Walking bill said colored races were being unfairly targeted. Newsome agreed, but Pointed out that California has a high pedestrian mortality rate The bill also warned that “it could unintentionally reduce the safety of pedestrians and increase the number of deaths and serious injuries.”
Similarly, Newsome said a bicycle bill May backfire and increase collisions and deaths, especially among “Children who may not know how to determine vehicle speed or take the necessary precautions to succumb to traffic if necessary.”
Cal Matters Is a public interest journalism venture working to explain how the California State Capitol works and why it matters.
Budget, Repeats and Caution: Why Gov. Gavin Newsom Vetoed 66 Bills Source link Budget, Repeats and Caution: Why Gov. Gavin Newsom Vetoed 66 Bills