If you’re a politician marketing a big new government program with little need but high price tags, you need a smart marketing strategy. At the very least, you can use a decent sound bite to market. Such marketing is what the Biden administration is doing with parliamentary and media friends when it argues that reducing women’s workforce participation during a pandemic requires the implementation of federal paid family leave policies. is.
Please do not buy.
First, temporary issues should never be addressed with permanent government expansion. Women have dramatically dropped out of the workforce, and the unemployment rate has skyrocketed due to the once-in-a-century pandemic and the subsequent blockade of the economy by state and local governments. Fortunately, the virus soon appeared in the rear-view mirror, and the reality is that the economy is resuming rapidly. If the union agrees to reopen public schools from kindergarten to high school five days a week in the fall, everything should be back to normal. So there is no reason to take advantage of temporary difficulties to permanently saddle taxpayers with bad deals.
I understand why this advice is rarely followed. After all, “not wasting the crisis” is a good strategy for powers to take advantage of the pain of Americans to create programs that cannot be pushed through in normal times.
Second, the call to implement a new program to address the fact that women are still pandemic and hurt is based on false assumptions and passive media.
The Heritage Foundation scholar Rachel Gresler looked at the data and found that the pandemic and the accompanying blockade initially left more women than men unemployed and dropped out of the workforce, but no longer. For example, Greszler writes: “From February 2020 to April 2020, initially women’s employment fell by 17.9% and men’s employment fell by 14.3% … In March 2021, women’s employment fell by 4.9% and men’s employment fell. Has decreased by 5.0%. From the situation in February 2020 … But now women have 500,000 less employment losses than men. “
She also found that “between February and April 2020, the number of men in the workforce decreased by 4.3% and the number of women in the workforce decreased by 5.5%.” Still, by March 2021, women essentially closed the gap, saying that “the number of men in the workforce has decreased by 2.3% (2 million) and the number of women has decreased by 2.4% (1.9 million).” I filled it. The kickers are: “Since the COVID-19 pandemic began, women’s income has more than doubled that of men.”
Apparently, fact checking is no longer needed before taxpayers are burdened with billions of new spending.
The issue that people who wanted to implement a federal paid vacation program liked before the pandemic was that the United States would not offer paid vacation to workers, so I decided to make such opportunistic policies. You should get used to it. But this claim is secondary. The US government does not have a federal paid leave program, but government research shows that about 65% of US workers have some form of paid leave available. In fact, the lack of federal programs means that we are more flexible, adaptable, and often generous than the plans that some liberals and conservatives have in mind, such as paid vacation programs. It also means that it is a country with a vast and expanding corporate network that provides benefits.
Ironically, this pandemic forces employers and employees to experiment with new workplace arrangements and use technology, giving parents the flexibility to both work and care for their children. It can cause great shaking. Enforcing a universal government policy could prevent this change, as employers may feel that they are now able to require employees to work in the field.
In fact, rather than returning to pre-COVID limited work arrangements, government and state governments need to increase workplace flexibility by removing regulatory barriers that make it difficult to raise families. ..
Two such changes are to abolish the vocational license for childcare workers and to allow employees to be paid in the form of additional vacation time for overtime.
There are many more non-governmental ideas to help workers, and more to be discovered. Instead of plunging into federal paid vacation programs, pursue them.
Veronique de Rugy is a Senior Research Fellow at the Mercatus Center at George Mason University.
Biden’s family leave plan is a permanent burden for a temporary problem – Press Enterprise Source link Biden’s family leave plan is a permanent burden for a temporary problem – Press Enterprise