You should have a good idea of how the game went by turning off the national championships after about three minutes.
With Baylor’s first possession, Mark Vital missed the shot, got his own rebound, missed it again, got his own rebound again – and finally Davion Mitchell made a jumper. The next time the Bears got the ball, Vital got another aggressive rebound, which led to another basket. Gonzaga’s Jalen Suggs then turned the ball over with a charging foul, and Mitchell scored three points.
Looking at Baylor’s statistical profile, there were three factors that made him particularly prominent as an elite. It’s the ability to force three-point fire, aggressive rebounds, and turnovers.All of them were on display from the beginning With the Bears 86-70 victory on Monday night, And Gonzaga simply seemed overwhelmed.
At the beginning of this tournament, I had some questions – Oops! – About Baylor’s ability to impose that will defensively. According to kenpom.com, even after defeating Gonzaga, Bears remained in 22nd place nationwide with adjusted defense efficiency. That’s good, but not great.
But one of the absolute successes of the Bears in defense was the Forstern Over. Their defense has finished the season, which ranked fourth in sales. If they can force enough turnovers in the title game, they can avoid becoming the latest team carved out by Gonzaga’s excellent attacks.
They forced 14 while committing only 9.
That was just part of the story. Gonzaga actually shot 51% off the field, Baylor shot 45%, and Bears won 16 games in a game never so close. Baylor finished with 67 field goals in Gonzaga 49 times. This helped offset the disadvantages of shooting accuracy.
Sales were part of what gave Bears those additional opportunities. The rebound may have been a major factor. Baylor finished fifth in the country with an aggressive rebound rate, while Gonzaga finished 31st with a defensive rebound rate. It could have been a real fight on the board, but instead it was a rout.
Baylor ended with 16 aggressive rebounds. Gonzaga had only 17 defensive rebounds. Basically, when the Bears missed a shot, the chances of getting the ball back were about 50-50 anyway.
Finally, the 3-point line favored Baylor. It wasn’t a surprise, but it wasn’t always given.
The basketball 3-point revolution is based on the idea that if a player shoots 40% from a 3-point range, it is equivalent to shooting 60% with a 2-pointer. Gonzaga changed that mind a bit this season by shooting more than 60% in 2 seconds quite often. Bulldog was the top team in the nation with a 2-point shot rate, 71% against UCLA in the semi-finals and 76% against Clayton in Sweet 16.
Even on this disappointing night, Gonzaga shot 62.5% inside the arc. But for all the extra attempts, Baylor made the same number of 2-point baskets (20) as the bulldog. And when it comes to 3 pointers, it wasn’t a big contest.
Baylor finished the season as the top team in the country with a 3-point shot rate. Bears shot 23-10 over Ark in the title game, while Gonzaga shot 17-5. The bulldog didn’t need it, given that everything else went wrong.
I have shown how Gonzaga reached this point. Bulldogs outperformed Baylor 40-30 in paint and certainly created a simple basket share. But when the Bears created more 3 pointers, forced more turnovers, and dominated the board, Gonzaga’s benefits in the arc felt insignificant.
Baylor won the title by showing off all of his greatest strengths. Gonzaga couldn’t do much to prevent it.
Baylor’s strengths shine in title-game blowout – San Bernardino Sun Source link Baylor’s strengths shine in title-game blowout – San Bernardino Sun